[CQ-Contest] Qrp récords
Herbert Schoenbohm
herbert.schoenbohm at gmail.com
Sat May 16 10:55:56 EDT 2015
Felipe,
I don't know how just changing the operator will prove anything at all.
What I know to a moral certainty is the comparison on KP4TE alleged QRP
signal on ground wave and that of NP4A's full power signal from a great
location with a superb antenna system at the same time. This proved to
me that KP4KE's claim of running "4.7 watts to a double bazooka" when
he established his published record that his QRP" entry was totally
bogus. The signal measurements made here of the two stations in
comparison do not lie.
Herb Schoenbohm, KV4FZ
On 5/16/2015 8:03 AM, Felipe J. Hernández wrote:
> To address Herb's comments:
>
> We had an honest conversation with kp4ke regarding the questions around his
> qrp and other operations.
> HE has agreed to allow ERic Np3a to operate his station and to show the
> world how his station performs in qrp, the official date set by him was on
> wpx cw this year.
>
> Certainly we are anxious as you to make sure that these were all valid
> entries, let's wait for wpx and see.
>
> 73's
>
> Felipe
> NP4Z
>
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 12:52:26 -0400
> From: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbs at vitelcom.net>
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Re. TO7A Debacle
> Message-ID: <5553814A.9070103 at vitelcom.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
> There are others in the record book essentially in perpetuity. The fact
> that CQ Contesting still posts some of the biggest malefactors, i.e. the
> low band QRP world records of an infamous station in KP4, just prevents
> others from even giving such an impossible score a legitimate challenge.
> These were certainty challenged and with the adequate proof of the fact
> that the were the result of cheating. But since CQ let this matter just
> slide and didn't properly DQ, it stands as a detriment to radio
> contesting for those who follow the rules and as an encouragement to
> those who don't .
>
> Looking ahead, either we slay this beast of contesting as we know it
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list