[CQ-Contest] Proposed rules changes

[Larry]

Probably true Yan but as Mike (W0MU) pointed out how will I know in advance 
that I might be in the top 10 in some category and therefore might need to 
provide a recording? My granddaughter is a ham but would be hard pressed to 
float a 100USD for a netbook computer at the moment on her own. So I guess 
she would need to make sure she doesn't end up in the top 10 such that she 
needs a recording. [Fortunately,  she does her contesting from my station.]

73, Larry  W6NWS

-----Original Message----- 
From: XV4Y (Yan)
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 8:18 PM
To: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Proposed rules changes

Hi Larry,

These requirement will in practice be enforced only for "top scorers".
I think neither "newcomers with cheap stations" or "oldtimers with boat 
anchors" will qualify for top scores.

It's my opinion, but I might be wrong.
Someone talked about Chip K7JA winning with an old radio without CAT.
It's a great achievement without doubt. However this particular example is 
not relevant as Chip had to spend several hundreds of dollars for his plane 
ticket and so.
Buying a used netbook computer for 100$ would have not be an "out of budget" 
expense.

73,
Yan.
---
Yannick DEVOS - XV4Y
http://xv4y.radioclub.asia/
http://varc.radioclub.asia/

> Le 22 mai 2015 à 23:00, cq-contest-request at contesting.com a écrit :
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 10:01:03 -0400
> From: "Larry" <lknain at nc.rr.com>
> To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Proposed rules changes
> Message-ID: <CD9FEDE3C89C425CB2A2C6162406BA32 at XV2W>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=response
>
> I realize some of this is reaction to the TO7A events.
>
> On the one hand we talk about trying to encourage new contesters but in 
> this
> thread we are suggesting possibly more equipment or equipment capability
> which could be overwhelming to new contester or even an older contester 
> with
> limited means. There are still hams without computers (or at least not
> connected to a radio).  There are others that are running older computers
> and can't afford to move to something newer.
>
> 73, Larry  W6NWS

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest