[CQ-Contest] Distance-Based Scoring

[Jeff Stai]

Yes, but not all of them, and top tens are still emphasized. 73 jeff wk6i

On Tuesday, May 26, 2015, David Siddall <hhamwv at gmail.com> wrote:

> I think ARRL already does break out geographic regions as well as division
> clusters for at least some of their contests in their full results
> articles.  See, for example:
>
> http://www.arrl.org/files/file/ContestResults/2014/2014%20ARRL%20DX%20CW%20-%20Full%20Results%20-%20Version%201_14.pdf
>
> 73, Dave K3ZJ
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 5:22 PM, Jeff Stai <wk6i.jeff at gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','wk6i.jeff at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Ward Silver <hwardsil at gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','hwardsil at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>
>> > My opinion is that regional-based reporting and operator comparison
>> works
>> > a lot better and is actually close to comparing apples to apples.
>>
>>
>> Perhaps QST could be persuaded to list regional top five scores for ALL
>> ARRL contests, and the ARRL to actively promote the sponsoring of plaques
>> for same?
>>
>> 73 jeff wk6i
>>
>> --
>> Jeff Stai ~ wk6i.jeff at gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','wk6i.jeff at gmail.com');>
>> Twisted Oak Winery ~ http://www.twistedoak.com/
>> Facebook ~ http://www.facebook.com/twistedoak
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','CQ-Contest at contesting.com');>
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>
>

-- 
Jeff Stai ~ wk6i.jeff at gmail.com
Twisted Oak Winery ~ http://www.twistedoak.com/
Facebook ~ http://www.facebook.com/twistedoak