[CQ-Contest] Counting uniques

[JIM NEIGER]

I believe that uniques should count, and have witnessed over the decades - 
very much depending upon from where I'm operating - the rarer, the more real 
uniques.  QUESTION:  SU1AH needed me for a new DXCC when I was at D44BC in 
the late '80's.  Do I not count this double multiplier because Ahmad worked 
only me??

Fundamentally more troubling to me is that AGAIN the Committee seems to be 
on a quest to combine Single Operator with Single Operator/Assisted.  I 
thought the survey it conducted a couple years ago answered that??  Assisted 
is with us forever.  Fondly and encourage its use,  and manage it 
appropriately.    Just categorize all assisted as MULTI-OPERATOR, which it 
truly is............

QUESTION:  Will the Committee Leadership continue to conduct this survey 
until it gets the answer it wants??  If that's reality, that's fine.  Just 
share with us all that it's the Committee's goal.  Thank you.

Vy 73

Jim Neiger
N6TJ

-----Original Message----- 
From: Oliver Dröse
Sent: Friday, September 04, 2015 6:53 AM
To: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Counting uniques

Charles,

> ​American bosses of American contests show little understanding nor care
> for the DX entries.

Interesting viewpoint taking into account they just asked YOU for YOUR
opinion on the topic of uniques!

73, Olli


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest