[CQ-Contest] cqcontest.net
Steve London
n2icarrl at gmail.com
Sun Apr 3 16:36:47 EDT 2016
Rudy,
I think you have misinterpreted my response. We are talking about the
unassisted category. While it is up the the contest directors and
managers to make a ruling, I would imagine that for the assisted
category, the real-time scoreboard would be allowed.
73,
Steve, N2IC
On 04/03/2016 02:09 PM, Rudy Bakalov wrote:
> Steve,
>
> Do consider your response in the context of the previous widely popular thread on attracting youth to contesting. The realtime scoreboard makes contesting a contest for many ops that do not stand a chance to get top ranking. They pick a competitor and try to outscore them based on the scoreboard. It is the scoreboard that makes contesting fun for those who use it.
>
> Virtually all other sports evolve and develop new techniques and technologies. Why is contesting any different and tries to promote mediocracy?
>
> Further, if organizers really want to impose rules that slow innovation, they should develop a set of guiding principles and objectives. Right now many of the restrictions are arbitrary.
>
> Let contesting innovate before it joins the dinosaurs.
>
> Rudy N2WQ
>
> Sent using a tiny keyboard. Please excuse brevity, typos, or inappropriate autocorrect.
>
>
>> On Apr 3, 2016, at 2:41 PM, Steve London <n2icarrl at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> My response to contest directors and managers is: change the rules for next year so that it is not allowed in the future.
>>
>> 73,
>> Steve, N2IC
>
>
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list