[CQ-Contest] NAQP Revised Rules
AE1P
ae1p at arrl.net
Fri Dec 16 11:02:43 EST 2016
Amen!!
Thx, Dave.
73,
Neil,
AE1P
On 12/16/2016 1:14 AM, David Gilbert wrote:
> Not sure why this is so difficult to understand.
>
> As I see it, the focus of NAQP has always been as a single op activity
> ... low power and simple structure (I could list several facets of the
> contest that support that claim). Packet pretty much disrupts that
> intent, so those who insist on using packet get relegated to a
> "secondary" multi-user category instead of adding another category to
> support an activity (packet) that the contest as originally configured
> probably preferred to avoid anyway.
>
> You're trying to broaden the focus of this contest and make it like
> lots of others. Most NAQP ops seem to prefer that it doesn't. I'm
> not a huge fan of K0HB's incessant "a boy and his radio" mantra, but I
> think it applies pretty well in this case. In my opinion, that's a
> major appeal of the contest.
>
> Dave AB7E
--
73,
Neil,
AE1P
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list