[CQ-Contest] W5WMU experiment in NAQP

[Chris Hurlbut]

I don't understand.

Why does one have to assume the rules were written to create a level
playing field?

This is poor justification for creation of a "KU8E Category" in any
contest.

-Chris KL9A
On Jan 8, 2016 12:46 PM, "Jeff Clarke" <ku8e at bellsouth.net> wrote:

> Chris,
>
> There aren't any contest rules for any contest that specially say that.
>
> One has to assume when the rules were written that was the intent. Is it
> really fair for every to be grouped into one category based on running 100
> watts?
>
> They make an exception for QRP. Why don't they just group them in with
> everyone else too?
>
> If they have a QRP category then why can't they have a HP category as well?
>
> Jeff
> On Jan 8, 2016 2:32 PM, Chris Hurlbut <chriskl9a at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Where does it say the NAQP rules were made to create a level playing field?
>
> -Chris KL9A
>
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Jeff Clarke <ku8e at bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Stan,
>
> That's exactly what the NAQP rules do. Everyone has to run 100 watts and
> that's somehow fair and a level playing field for everyone? As we all know
> your antennas make your station not running high power. I could probably
> run a KW and guys like N9RV will still kick my butt.
>
> I wish more contest sponsors would add a Tribander/wires category like CQ
> has. Guys like myself who are limited as far as what we can put up for
> antennas should be able to win something every once awhile instead of just
> playing around and 'having fun". I'm just as competitive as any who has a
> nice station at their disposal.
>
> JeffOn Jan 8, 2016 9:01 AM, Stan Stockton <wa5rtg at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > There sure is a lot of talk about "level playing fields".
> >
> > Are there really those who think we should bring everyone down to the
> lowest level of station and antennas so we can say we have a level playing
> field?  If so you had better set all of them up in a flat field within a
> few miles of each other.
> >
> > Here are a couple examples of level playing fields -  2m repeaters and
> computer simulated contesting.
> >
> > I would be sad, but I would very quickly find a new hobby if my
> activities were limited by the lowest common denominator - limited to
> dipoles, low power, operating 2m through a repeater, etc.
> >
> > About 75% of my enjoyment is thinking about ways to improve my station
> and trying to implement changes that could make it better.
> >
> > The challenge is more difficult but the reward greater when you try to
> get another 1 dB of gain when after 40 years of working at it you thought
> you had done all you could do.
> >
> > There is a lot of fun left out there for a lot of people who might only
> have a thousand foot roll of 18 gauge stranded wire ($25 on EBAY), a roll
> of black fishing twine ($8 from Wal-Mart) and a couple of trees.  End
> result, after all the fun, is you are way ahead of those who have dipoles,
> multi-band verticals, etc and perhaps ahead of the guy down the street with
> his tribander on a 50 foot tower.
> >
> > 73... Stan, K5GO
> >
> >
> > Sent from Stan's IPhone
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Jan 7, 2016, at 10:18 PM, Jeff Clarke <ku8e at bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > Why not allow high power in the NAQP? The guys that win all the time
> typically run HP in other contests anyway. Plus most of them have large
> antenna farms as well. You call that a level playing field? I don't think
> so.
> > >
> > >  Jeff KU8E
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>