[CQ-Contest] NAQP Power Level

Richard F DiDonna NN3W richnn3w at verizon.net
Sat Jan 9 09:33:15 EST 2016

Couldn't disagree with #2 more.  A not-insignificant percentage of QSOs 
in NAQP is with casual hams who are simply spinning the VFO. Especially 
NAQP where there is not the frenetic pace as Sweeps or one of the DX 

73 Rich NN3W

On 1/9/2016 12:19 AM, Bill via CQ-Contest wrote:
> It would be really easy to maintain the purity of the NAQP as a contest between
> 100W no-Skimmer stations:
> 1) Remove the part of rule #15 that acknowledges the possible entry of HP stations.
> 2) Only count contacts between entrants of the contest. The 7 day entry deadline
>     is not very rigorous. By submitting an entry, an op would be declaring that
>     they were indeed 100W with no Skimmer use.
> The few ops that got on for a few hours with a KW to have fun with "fast rates"
> would have wasted the time of the serious competitors equally.
> 73, Bill KO7SS in Arizona
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list