[CQ-Contest] NAQP Power Level

W0MU w0mu at w0mu.com
Sat Jan 9 10:48:10 EST 2016

Must be a slow news day.  Why do we continue to create problems when 
none exist?

Lets alienate more people so they don't get on.  Gosh that sounds like 
fun working less people.

I guess we should only count entries that work the entire time period, 
because those that get on for the last couple of hours to have fun, 
cannot be tolerated by those "serious" ops.

What is wrong with some of you?


On 1/8/2016 10:19 PM, Bill via CQ-Contest wrote:
> It would be really easy to maintain the purity of the NAQP as a contest between
> 100W no-Skimmer stations:
> 1) Remove the part of rule #15 that acknowledges the possible entry of HP stations.
> 2) Only count contacts between entrants of the contest. The 7 day entry deadline
>     is not very rigorous. By submitting an entry, an op would be declaring that
>     they were indeed 100W with no Skimmer use.
> The few ops that got on for a few hours with a KW to have fun with "fast rates"
> would have wasted the time of the serious competitors equally.
> 73, Bill KO7SS in Arizona
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list