[CQ-Contest] CQWW Committee Restructured

[VE2TZT]

I do not make those suggestions for myself but to answer to the Randy's 
question :

"what do you suggest would make CQ WW more interesting for those not bordering the Atlantic Ocean?"

So in addition to 1 point per QSO, making the US states, VE provinces and JA call areas some new multipliers would provide multipliers for NA in the same way that European have already multipliers inside Europe and at the their East.
That would also provide more multipliers for Asian.

The benefits for us in VE2 should be more traffic especially during the second half of the night when all the bands are closed to Europe. Currently there is very few traffic from central USA and West coast during that part of the night and I think this is related to the poor interest for those stations to stay awaken related to the 0 pointers and 0 multipliers inside USA.

Gilles VA2EW


On 20/07/2016 13:42, Jim Brown wrote:
> On Tue,7/19/2016 12:00 PM, VE2TZT wrote:
>> Creating 70 more multipliers we do not need anymore those few exotic 
>> multipliers just having to pay to win 
>
> Living in VE2, YOU don't need more multipliers, but WE in Zone 3, 
> where EU and AF is MUCH more difficult to work on 40, 80, and 160, DO 
> need more multipliers to compensate for those EU and AF mults that you 
> can work on those bands. Likewise for hams in OC and much of SA and AS.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus