[CQ-Contest] "Improving SS"

[Taylor Kelly]

Hi Art,

Seems to stem from a misunderstanding that sections exist for the purpose of being multipliers, rather than the multipliers existing because of sections…

73, kelly
ve4xt


> On Jul 24, 2016, at 6:21 PM, Art Boyars <artboyars at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> (Sorry if this has already been addressed.  I'm behind in reading the
> Reflector postings.)
> 
> "The only thing I would do to improve SS is to delete those four VE3
> sections and go back to ON."
> 
> What in the world are you talking about?  RAC made new Sections; they
> become multipliers in SS.  It's been that way longer than any of us can
> remember.
> 
> Should we delete WCF and go back to just NFla and SFla?  Should we delete
> DE and go back to MDD? How about WTX?
> 
> Would you delete ORG and go back to just LAX and SDG? (And delete whatever
> Calif Sections got added since the first SS?)
> 
> And would you support DC as a mult in SS, because the (only) justification
> for it's not being a Mult is that it is not an ARRL Section?
> 
> Sheesh!
> 
> 73, Art K3KU
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest