[CQ-Contest] When it's over, it's over (again)
ve3dz at rigexpert.net
Thu Nov 10 14:37:04 EST 2016
So, if you (or your circle of contesters) work WWxWWW with precedence "A" and then heard him later and realized it's "U", but not "A", you never go back and correct it to "U"?
How is it different from if you worked him and copied "A" (you already hit Enter) and then took more careful listen and realized it's not "A", but "U"? I mean doing it during the Contest, not after.
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jim Brown
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 11:24 AM
To: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] When it's over, it's over (again)
Right. Within my circle of contesters, it is considered good practice to fix typing mistakes (like "o" instead of zero), but not to correct mis-copied parts of the exchange (like wrong precedence, check or section in SS).
73, Jim K9YC
On Thu,11/10/2016 7:39 AM, W0MU Mike Fatchett wrote:
> I would have no problem fixing a typo like N44ogw.
More information about the CQ-Contest