[CQ-Contest] R: WAE PHONE CONTEST FREQ, To be or not to be?
Tonno Vahk
tonno.vahk at gmail.com
Thu Sep 8 04:27:43 EDT 2016
Well, discussion is surely not useless if there is a rule that creates confusion and that the organizers have not been enforcing.
We would surely welcome a clear statement by the organizers that as a minimum those QSOs in forbidden segments WILL be removed from the logs and repetitive intentional violation WILL lead to DQ.
73
ES5TV
-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Helmut Mueller
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2016 9:04 AM
To: Matt IZ3EYZ - Matteo Marzilli; Lyubomir Slavov, OR2F
Cc: Saulius Zalnerauskas; Cq-Contest
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] R: WAE PHONE CONTEST FREQ, To be or not to be?
Dear friends.
This discussion is absolutely useless. The rules say and MEAN do not use these areas. Full stop!
If yo do so you are in danger of penalties or DQs.
Last year we did not investigate this or did not DQ anyone and we have reason for that. No guarantee it is the same this year.
Just read and play by the rules and you are fine.
73
Helmut DF7ZS
WAEDC Manager
> "Lyubomir Slavov, OR2F" <on8lds at gmail.com> hat am 7. September 2016 um 22:43
> geschrieben:
>
>
> Hello Sam,
>
> there is a non-written rule, we should never expect to meet so clear as it
> is pronounced :
>
> *"WORK FIRST - WORRY LATER !"*
>
> So, in accordance with the contest rules, you shouldn't run CQ in those
> windows, but if you get someone there - do not hesitate to pounce over.
>
> Afterwards, if the "bad boy" goes DQ or gets any other penalty as a result
> of the Committee's decision - either this will not affect your result,
> either it will affect the results of all his correspondents there.
>
> And versa - if you skip any possible QSO within the mentioned segments, you
> just reduce your own result :-)
>
> Good luck !
>
> 73,
> Leo / OR2F
>
> On 7 September 2016 at 10:53, Matt IZ3EYZ - Matteo Marzilli <
> iz3eyz at virgilio.it> wrote:
>
> > Sam,
> >
> > it would be wise if you first check the examples you publish for your
> > theories the next time.
> >
> > If you work YV4YC on 7127 @04.10z and HC2AO on 7106 @04.20z and get QTCs
> > from them on the same QRG, it doesn't mean all their previous QSOs they
> > send
> > back to you through QTCs took place on that QRG as well.
> >
> > For example this is taken from my WAE SSB 2015 log and you can easily check
> > QRGs through independent sources (ie. CLX spots):
> > QSO: 7174 PH 2015-09-12 0113 IR4X 59 0018 YV4YC 59
> > 002
> > (came back to my CQ)
> > QSO: 7065 PH 2015-09-12 0307 IR4X 59 0109 HC2AO 59
> > 049
> > (by spot)
> >
> > Of course I don't know about the other Europeans and I couldn't care less
> > but my QSOs with these stations took place within the allowed contest
> > segments unlike you state something else.
> >
> > 73
> >
> > Matt
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Messaggio originale-----
> > Da: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] Per conto di
> > Saulius Zalnerauskas
> > Inviato: martedì 6 settembre 2016 19.41
> > A: Cq-Contest
> > Oggetto: [CQ-Contest] WAE PHONE CONTEST FREQ, To be or not to be?
> >
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > To be or not to be-that is the question:
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/To_be,_or_not_to_be
> >
> > This weekend another WRTC event. WAE DX Phone Contest. Very interesting and
> > of course very important contest for those, who are qualyfying to be
> > http://www.wrtc2018.de/index.php/en/qualification/selection-criteria-2
> >
> > Some Team Leaders now has guaranteed, some are with question. And this one
> > can make a much difference in final tables.
> >
> > Let's read WAE Contest rules
> > http://www.darc.de/der-club/referate/dx/contest/waedc/en/rules/ . You can
> > see *SSB*: 3650-3700; 7050-7060; 7100-7130; 14100-14125; 14300-14350 kHz.
> >
> > Try to imagine himself if You are one of those qualifiers. Station
> > (multiplier) calling CQ Contest on 7.128 kHz. Everybody working them.
> > Because - station is multiplier, so everyone is cheater?
> >
> > Read what happen if You doing this:
> > Violation of the rules of the contest or unsportsmanlike conduct will be
> > deemed sufficient cause for disqualification. The decisions of the
> > contest-committee are final.
> >
> > But we go to results and if You are cheater - You are first in the World
> > http://www.dxhf.darc.de/~mydxhf/dxhfdb/urkunde/urkunde.
> > php?call=px5e&jahr=20
> > 15&contest=WAESSB
> >
> > Well my dear friends, let's take a look to my last year LOG:
> > QSO: 7128 PH 2015-09-12 0002 LY5W 59 0005 PX5E 59
> > 0010
> > QSO: 7124 PH 2015-09-12 0003 LY5W 59 0006 PX2A 59
> > 0015
> > PX2A - 2nd World
> > http://www.dxhf.darc.de/~mydxhf/dxhfdb/urkunde/urkunde.
> > php?call=px2a&jahr=20
> > 15&contest=WAESSB
> > and much more, but those Brasilian stations are in IARU region 3 working
> > with Europeans in IARU R1 :)
> >
> > Ok, let's go next:
> > QSO: 7127 PH 2015-09-13 0410 LY5W 59 0403 YV4YC 59
> > 0011
> > QTC: 7127 PH 2015-09-13 0411 LY5W 1/10 YV4YC 0112
> > LZ5K 0043
> > QTC: 7127 PH 2015-09-13 0411 LY5W 1/10 YV4YC 0113
> > IR4X 0018
> > QTC: 7127 PH 2015-09-13 0412 LY5W 1/10 YV4YC 0117
> > DL5L 0047
> > QTC: 7127 PH 2015-09-13 0412 LY5W 1/10 YV4YC 0119
> > SK3W 0039
> > QTC: 7127 PH 2015-09-13 0412 LY5W 1/10 YV4YC 0149
> > DJ7WW 0057
> > QTC: 7127 PH 2015-09-13 0412 LY5W 1/10 YV4YC 0200
> > I2VRN 0074
> > QTC: 7127 PH 2015-09-13 0413 LY5W 1/10 YV4YC 0201
> > DJ7EO 0053
> > QTC: 7127 PH 2015-09-13 0413 LY5W 1/10 YV4YC 0404
> > F4DXW 1213
> > QTC: 7127 PH 2015-09-13 0413 LY5W 1/10 YV4YC 0405
> > DL1NKS 0132
> > QTC: 7127 PH 2015-09-13 0414 LY5W 1/10 YV4YC 0407
> > DC4A 0349
> > or
> > QTC: 7106 PH 2015-09-12 0420 LY5W 5/10 HC2AO 0259
> > RT4F 0106
> > QTC: 7106 PH 2015-09-12 0420 LY5W 5/10 HC2AO 0302
> > OE6Z 0065
> > QTC: 7106 PH 2015-09-12 0420 LY5W 5/10 HC2AO 0303
> > YT9M 0018
> > QTC: 7106 PH 2015-09-12 0420 LY5W 5/10 HC2AO 0305
> > LZ5K 0082
> > QTC: 7106 PH 2015-09-12 0420 LY5W 5/10 HC2AO 0305
> > OK7M 0028
> > QTC: 7106 PH 2015-09-12 0420 LY5W 5/10 HC2AO 0305
> > UA2F 0057
> > QTC: 7106 PH 2015-09-12 0420 LY5W 5/10 HC2AO 0306
> > DL5L 0066
> > QTC: 7106 PH 2015-09-12 0421 LY5W 5/10 HC2AO 0306
> > LY9A 0039
> > QTC: 7106 PH 2015-09-12 0421 LY5W 5/10 HC2AO 0307
> > IR4X 0109
> > QTC: 7106 PH 2015-09-12 0421 LY5W 5/10 HC2AO 0308
> > EI7M 0062
> > etc etc
> >
> > and try to calculate how many cheaters You found now from Europe. And they
> > are WRTC participants.
> > So where is fair play?
> >
> > What to do? Explain please.
> >
> > To be stupid and pretend that nothing is happening, or follow the rules and
> > remain in last place fool Sam LY5W
> > http://www.wrtc2018.de/index.php/en/qualification/
> > standings-2?value=ly5w&tas
> > k=callsign
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list