[CQ-Contest] 3V8SS disqualified from WW SSB and WRTC

Sat Feb 25 22:49:00 EST 2017

The clusters have filters for multiple CW spots now.  It would be no 
different on SSB.  Something like every 15 mins or if you move freq a KC 
etc.

On 2/25/2017 8:13 PM, Joe wrote:
> or the guy that spoofs a compeditors IP and then spot him to make him 
> get a DQ UG here we go again.
>
> Joe WB9SBD
> Sig
> The Original Rolling Ball Clock
> Idle Tyme
> Idle-Tyme.com
> http://www.idle-tyme.com
> On 2/25/2017 7:04 PM, Joe wrote:
>> I also like this self spotting.
>>
>> BUT.....  and there always is a BUT isn't there? I like the three 
>> QSO's rule, BUT.  there needs to also be a max per hour?
>>
>> Then gain here we are, back to the same problem, UG!
>>
>> I can just see someone spotting themself after every q.
>>
>> Joe WB9SBD
>> Sig
>> The Original Rolling Ball Clock
>> Idle Tyme
>> Idle-Tyme.com
>> http://www.idle-tyme.com
>> On 2/24/2017 4:30 PM, Stan Stockton wrote:
>>> Yes.  This is what I wrote about a year and a half ago:
>>>
>>> 2015-10-28 4:06 GMT+01:00 Stan Stockton <wa5rtg at gmail.com>:
>>> There should be a rule allowing the software to automatically submit 
>>> a self spot after you have logged perhaps three QSOs on the same 
>>> frequency - same rule for everyone. After all, when you call CQ on 
>>> CW you are, in effect, self spotting. There is a huge advantage in 
>>> being spotted and, on SSB, there is a huge difference in the number 
>>> of spots for different stations giving advantage to those who are 
>>> spotted frequently and quickly after a frequency change. 73... Stan, 
>>> K5GO
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Feb 24, 2017, at 9:49 AM, Steve London <n2icarrl at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On CW, we already have the equivalent of self spotting, thanks to 
>>>> CW Skimmer and the RBN. It's virtually impossible to NOT be 
>>>> spotted. CW Skimmer/RBN is the great equalizer - you no longer have 
>>>> to depend on a network of friends to spot you.
>>>>
>>>> We wouldn't be having this discussion if there was a SSB Skimmer. 
>>>> Right now, we have a system where "those with the right friends" 
>>>> have an advantage. Why not simply allow self spotting on SSB ?
>>>>
>>>> 73,
>>>> Steve, N2IC
>>>>
>>>>> On 02/22/2017 12:22 PM, Bob Henderson wrote:
>>>>> Having myself met with unfair and unjustified treatment at the 
>>>>> hands of
>>>>> RDXC adjudicators I can empathise with those claiming unfair 
>>>>> treatment in
>>>>> adjudication.  However in this case having looked at the information
>>>>> supplied and done a little further digging, I am unsure my empathy is
>>>>> justified.
>>>>>
>>>>> 3V8SS it seems acknowledges cheer-leading by his fellow Tunisians 
>>>>> KG5OUE
>>>>> and F4HJD but claims not to have encouraged it.  I am inclined to 
>>>>> believe
>>>>> him, given some of my own friends have spotted me during contests 
>>>>> and I
>>>>> have NEVER, that is NOT EVER, asked anyone to do so.
>>>>>
>>>>> That said, HB9EOU appears to be rather more than a random contact 
>>>>> with
>>>>> Switzerland.  Last year HB9EOU operated in the IOTA contest from 
>>>>> 3V8SM on
>>>>> Djerba Island AF-083 along with F4HJD.  Ash (3V8SS) + F4HJD + 
>>>>> 3V8CB had
>>>>> activated 3V8SM from Djerba Island a couple of months earlier.
>>>>>
>>>>> The recording of the contact with HB9EOU seems odd, though the 
>>>>> events not
>>>>> entirely inexplicable but small circles in which the same calls 
>>>>> crop up
>>>>> repetitively raise questions.  Perhaps it's all an extraordinary
>>>>> coincidence but there is enough doubt for me to wonder whether my 
>>>>> empathy
>>>>> might have been misplaced.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bob, 5B4AGN
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 09:48:33 -0600
>>>>> From: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra at sasktel.net>
>>>>> To: "'Ashraf Chaabane'" <ash.kf5eyy at gmail.com>, "'cq-contest'"
>>>>>          <cq-contest at contesting.com>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] R: Re: R: 3V8SS disqualified from WW SSB 
>>>>> and
>>>>>          WRTC
>>>>> Message-ID: <E976655BE7DB448B8806659C02036C2C at DOUG8PC>
>>>>> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="us-ascii"
>>>>>
>>>>> After reading your post and based on your response to the 
>>>>> committee, I would
>>>>> conclude that Bob, W5OV; Doug, KR2Q; Scott, W4PA are nitpickers 
>>>>> with an
>>>>> agenda.
>>>>> If anything valid is further introduced to support the committee's 
>>>>> decision,
>>>>> then I would revise my opinion. As it stands, I believe you were 
>>>>> unfairly
>>>>> DQd.
>>>>> Doug
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On 
>>>>> Behalf Of
>>>>> Ashraf Chaabane
>>>>> Sent: February-22-17 7:34 AM
>>>>> To: cq-contest
>>>>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] R: Re: R: 3V8SS disqualified from WW SSB 
>>>>> and WRTC
>>>>>
>>>>> Mike, Ria and all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I put online the CC accusations (their native emails) and my 
>>>>> responses:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.kf5eyy.info/3V8SS_WWSSB16_DQ.htm
>>>>>
>>>>> I think that allows everyone to read from both sides. Now it's up 
>>>>> to you to
>>>>> comment!
>>>>>
>>>>> 73
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Ash ~ 3V8SS/KF5EYY
>>>>> http://www.kf5eyy.info/
>>>>> Phone/SMS: (+216) 22670026
>>>>> Skype: kf5eyy
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>>>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest