[CQ-Contest] CX2DK CQWW checklog

Martin LU5DX lu5dx at lucg.com.ar
Sat Mar 4 09:59:08 EST 2017


 From CQ WW DX Contests rules available at: http://cqww.com/rules.htm

XII

...

*C. Audio Recordings:*Any single operator entrant (see V.A.1) competing 
for a top three finish at the (a) World, (b) Continent, or (c) USA 
levels, must record the transmitted and received audio as heard by the 
operator for the duration of the contest operation. The recording must 
be in a common format (e.g., mp3) and should include the audio to each 
ear as a separate channel. The recording may be requested by the 
Committee within 90 days after the log deadline to help adjudicate the 
log. The recording files must be provided by the entrant within 5 days 
of the request. If no recording is made available, the Committee may 
reclassify or disqualify the entry.

...

73,

Martin LU5DX


El 04/03/2017 a las 11:01 a.m., Joe escribió:
> Does this apply to every category?
>
> AND
>
> Is it ONLY for the #1 slot or does it apply to any levels below #1, 
> Like 2nd place etc.?
>
> Joe WB9SBD
> Sig
> The Original Rolling Ball Clock
> Idle Tyme
> Idle-Tyme.com
> http://www.idle-tyme.com
> On 3/4/2017 12:28 AM, Maarten van R wrote:
>> Rudy,
>>
>> I think a DQ is something different than having your log being 
>> reclassified
>> as checklog. For instance, your score won't count for WRTC qualification
>> but your not automatically thrown out of the qualifying process.
>> Furthermore, you can still be picked as a teammate which is not 
>> possible if
>> you were DQ'ed.
>>
>> The op new about the rule and choose not to follow it. IMHO, If you are
>> able to build and operate a category winning contest station, you 
>> should be
>> able to record 48 hour of your contest audio as well.
>>
>> 73, Maarten PD2R
>>
>>
>> Op za 4 mrt. 2017 om 02:36 schreef Rudy Bakalov via CQ-Contest <
>> cq-contest at contesting.com>
>>
>> Not knowing the full details, however, it seems that the station has 
>> been
>> DQ'd solely due to the lack of audio recording. That is, no other rule
>> violation or suspected violation was mentioned. So if indeed the log
>> checker did not have any other concerns and the lack of recording was 
>> the
>> only reason, the DQ seems a bit excessive.
>>
>> Rudy N2WQ
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest



More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list