[CQ-Contest] what is required of recevied audio, and whay

[Barry]

That's why other contests should follow the (now old) lead of DARC and 
the WAE.  Combine the two SO categories.  They're pretty much 
indistinguishable and unenforceable now.

Barry W2UP

On 3/9/2017 12:06, Steve London wrote:
> I agree with Ed - it was a terrible decision to allow panadapters and 
> waterfalls in the unassisted category. It was obvious to me that it 
> wouldn't take long for bandmaps to be merged with these displays, 
> making unassisted and assisted indistinguishable to the adjudicators, 
> even with a recording. The law of unintended consequences.
>
> 73,
> Steve, N2IC
>
>
> On 03/09/2017 11:29 AM, Jim Brown wrote:
>> Hi Ed,
>>
>> How did you feel when you bought your first memory keyer that could be
>> programmed for serial numbers?  Mine was an AEA, sometime in the '60s, I
>> think. Do you use programmable memories and dupe-checking with logging
>> software? Or are you still sending everything with a paddle, logging
>> with pencil and paper, and using a paper dupe sheet like we did in the
>> '50s?
>>
>> 73, Jim K9YC
>>
>> On Thu,3/9/2017 9:49 AM, Ed Sawyer wrote:
>>> This is why panadapters and waterfalls should never have been allowed
>>> in the
>>> unassisted category.  And why I have never used them.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>> .
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus