[CQ-Contest] SO Categories

[Jorge Diez - CX6VM]

Hello

5 days is for who want to be eligible for awards.  Anytime is good to send
a log to help in the process of checklog.

LU5DX and other do a great job typing in paper logs, collecting logs and
all kind of work to have a more acurate log checking process

Anyway 5 days is too much time, would be good to reduce it to 36 or 48 hours

Don´t like to merge assisted and non assisted as a way to solve this
problem, because next we will need to merge QRP, LP, HP and then single
operatorrs with multi operators.

73,
Jorge
CX6VM/CW5W



2017-03-12 16:10 GMT-03:00 Mark Bailey <kd4d at comcast.net>:

> Merging Assisted/Unlimited with multi-op?
>
> 73,
>
> Mark, kd4d
>
> On March 12, 2017 11:23:11 AM EDT, Saulius Zalnerauskas <
> ly5w.sam at gmail.com> wrote:
> >5 days after contest is very long time.
> >Best is 5 hours after contest.
> >Or just immiadetly.
> >Less cheaters.
> >But i am for ONE SINGLE OP CATEGORY.
> >NO ASSISTED.
> >Sam LY5W
> >
> >
> >2017-03-12 04:12  rašė:
> >
> >
> >If CQWW merges SO and SOA then I'll pass on that contest.  And I'll
> >also
> >pass on the CQ magazine subscription as well.
> >Same goes for any other contest that combines SO and SOA.
> >
> >I don't have a problem with operating unassisted, but I am puzzled as
> >to
> >why others want to eliminate the SO category. And I don't care if you
> >operate assisted if that is what you like to do.  I have no interest in
> >spots, skimmer, RBN, etc.  I have looked at them yes, but I am not
> >interested in using those during a contest.
> >
> >"The heavy handed CC action to deter cheaters is driving participation
> >away".  Yes Dale, me at least.
> >
> >"Then again I always got the sense that there was a movement to destroy
> >the
> >unassisted category for whatever reason".  Yes Ria there is, I see it
> >too.
> >
> >And then there is the 5 day log deadline that I do not like. I was
> >asked by
> >LU5DX (I think) to submit my CQWW CW log a few weeks ago, several
> >months
> >after the contest ended. He said it would help with the log checking,
> >so I
> >obliged and sent it in 3 months or so late.  If sending a log in 3
> >months
> >late is okay with the log checker, then why the 5 day deadline?  Why
> >not at
> >least include the following weekend?  Or perhaps a 10 day deadline?
> >
> >73 Scott W2LC
> >_______________________________________________
> >CQ-Contest mailing list
> >CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> >http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> --
> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>



-- 
73,
Jorge
CX6VM/CW5W