[CQ-Contest] SO Categories

[Martin Monsalvo - LU5DX]

Hola Geo,
Yes indeed. I think very competitive logs should be sent no later than 24 hours after the contest ends, preferably​bly​, if possible, right after the contest ends.

73,
Martin LU5DX

⁣Enviado desde BlueMail ​

En mar 13, 2017 10:05 a. m., en 10:05 a. m., Jorge Diez - CX6VM <cx6vm.jorge at gmail.com> escribió:
>Hello
>
>5 days is for who want to be eligible for awards.  Anytime is good to
>send
>a log to help in the process of checklog.
>
>LU5DX and other do a great job typing in paper logs, collecting logs
>and
>all kind of work to have a more acurate log checking process
>
>Anyway 5 days is too much time, would be good to reduce it to 36 or 48
>hours
>
>Don´t like to merge assisted and non assisted as a way to solve this
>problem, because next we will need to merge QRP, LP, HP and then single
>operatorrs with multi operators.
>
>73,
>Jorge
>CX6VM/CW5W
>
>
>
>2017-03-12 16:10 GMT-03:00 Mark Bailey <kd4d at comcast.net>:
>
>> Merging Assisted/Unlimited with multi-op?
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> Mark, kd4d
>>
>> On March 12, 2017 11:23:11 AM EDT, Saulius Zalnerauskas <
>> ly5w.sam at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >5 days after contest is very long time.
>> >Best is 5 hours after contest.
>> >Or just immiadetly.
>> >Less cheaters.
>> >But i am for ONE SINGLE OP CATEGORY.
>> >NO ASSISTED.
>> >Sam LY5W
>> >
>> >
>> >2017-03-12 04:12  rašė:
>> >
>> >
>> >If CQWW merges SO and SOA then I'll pass on that contest.  And I'll
>> >also
>> >pass on the CQ magazine subscription as well.
>> >Same goes for any other contest that combines SO and SOA.
>> >
>> >I don't have a problem with operating unassisted, but I am puzzled
>as
>> >to
>> >why others want to eliminate the SO category. And I don't care if
>you
>> >operate assisted if that is what you like to do.  I have no interest
>in
>> >spots, skimmer, RBN, etc.  I have looked at them yes, but I am not
>> >interested in using those during a contest.
>> >
>> >"The heavy handed CC action to deter cheaters is driving
>participation
>> >away".  Yes Dale, me at least.
>> >
>> >"Then again I always got the sense that there was a movement to
>destroy
>> >the
>> >unassisted category for whatever reason".  Yes Ria there is, I see
>it
>> >too.
>> >
>> >And then there is the 5 day log deadline that I do not like. I was
>> >asked by
>> >LU5DX (I think) to submit my CQWW CW log a few weeks ago, several
>> >months
>> >after the contest ended. He said it would help with the log
>checking,
>> >so I
>> >obliged and sent it in 3 months or so late.  If sending a log in 3
>> >months
>> >late is okay with the log checker, then why the 5 day deadline?  Why
>> >not at
>> >least include the following weekend?  Or perhaps a 10 day deadline?
>> >
>> >73 Scott W2LC
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >CQ-Contest mailing list
>> >CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> >http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>> --
>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>
>
>
>-- 
>73,
>Jorge
>CX6VM/CW5W
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest