[CQ-Contest] SO Categories

[Ria Jairam]

Yes,, decreases chances of log massaging.

I can't believe after contest I get emails from some unscrupulous
competitors to verify QSOs. I say what's in your log, you submit, I don't
help cheaters.

Ria
N2RJ

On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 9:04 AM Jorge Diez - CX6VM <cx6vm.jorge at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello
>
> 5 days is for who want to be eligible for awards.  Anytime is good to send
> a log to help in the process of checklog.
>
> LU5DX and other do a great job typing in paper logs, collecting logs and
> all kind of work to have a more acurate log checking process
>
> Anyway 5 days is too much time, would be good to reduce it to 36 or 48
> hours
>
> Don´t like to merge assisted and non assisted as a way to solve this
> problem, because next we will need to merge QRP, LP, HP and then single
> operatorrs with multi operators.
>
> 73,
> Jorge
> CX6VM/CW5W
>
>
>
> 2017-03-12 16:10 GMT-03:00 Mark Bailey <kd4d at comcast.net>:
>
> > Merging Assisted/Unlimited with multi-op?
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Mark, kd4d
> >
> > On March 12, 2017 11:23:11 AM EDT, Saulius Zalnerauskas <
> > ly5w.sam at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >5 days after contest is very long time.
> > >Best is 5 hours after contest.
> > >Or just immiadetly.
> > >Less cheaters.
> > >But i am for ONE SINGLE OP CATEGORY.
> > >NO ASSISTED.
> > >Sam LY5W
> > >
> > >
> > >2017-03-12 04:12  rašė:
> > >
> > >
> > >If CQWW merges SO and SOA then I'll pass on that contest.  And I'll
> > >also
> > >pass on the CQ magazine subscription as well.
> > >Same goes for any other contest that combines SO and SOA.
> > >
> > >I don't have a problem with operating unassisted, but I am puzzled as
> > >to
> > >why others want to eliminate the SO category. And I don't care if you
> > >operate assisted if that is what you like to do.  I have no interest in
> > >spots, skimmer, RBN, etc.  I have looked at them yes, but I am not
> > >interested in using those during a contest.
> > >
> > >"The heavy handed CC action to deter cheaters is driving participation
> > >away".  Yes Dale, me at least.
> > >
> > >"Then again I always got the sense that there was a movement to destroy
> > >the
> > >unassisted category for whatever reason".  Yes Ria there is, I see it
> > >too.
> > >
> > >And then there is the 5 day log deadline that I do not like. I was
> > >asked by
> > >LU5DX (I think) to submit my CQWW CW log a few weeks ago, several
> > >months
> > >after the contest ended. He said it would help with the log checking,
> > >so I
> > >obliged and sent it in 3 months or so late.  If sending a log in 3
> > >months
> > >late is okay with the log checker, then why the 5 day deadline?  Why
> > >not at
> > >least include the following weekend?  Or perhaps a 10 day deadline?
> > >
> > >73 Scott W2LC
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >CQ-Contest mailing list
> > >CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> > >http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
> > --
> > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
>
>
>
> --
> 73,
> Jorge
> CX6VM/CW5W
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>