[CQ-Contest] PJ4G ARRL DX SSB Recording by N2IC

[Mats Strandberg]

Fully support Frank's view and logic.

Someone claimed that Interleaved CQ is a part of the "evolution" and is
"innovation" of contesting. My opinion is that Interleaved CQ has
absolutely nothing to do with either innovation or evolution.

Instead, this is a "great" way to reduce the chances for small and medium
pistols to find RUN space in SSB contests, and is only favoring huge big
guns. Should smaller stations only be limited to S&P?

The traditional SO2R where one band is used like RUN (CQ) and another band
(or in-band) is used for S&P is of course nowadays an acceptable form of
contesting. This does not decrease the available total bandwidth. as
someone else is already using the other frequency for CQ.

73 de Mats RM2D (SM6LRR)



2017-03-13 23:59 GMT+03:00 <donovanf at starpower.net>:

> First, its clear that ARRL rules do not address the issue of two
> interleaving run stations on the same band. That leaves it up to
> the community to decide what to do.
>
>
> According to 3830 there were sixty multi-op entries in the ARRL
> SSB DX Contest. What happens to this contest if all sixty of us
> start using interleaved two run stations on 20 meters?
>
>
> on 15 meters?
>
>
> Even worse: on 40 meters?
>
>
> Do we all want to follow PJ4G's lead?
>
>
> 73
> Frank
> W3LPL
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: "Ria Jairam" <rjairam at gmail.com>
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com, john at kk9a.com
> Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 8:09:39 PM
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] PJ4G ARRL DX SSB Recording by N2IC
>
> Some bands are more limited in space than others.
> 40m - 75kHz
> 20m - 200kHz
> 15m - 250kHz
> 10m - 1.4MHz
>
> Some bands are more productive than others, depending on propagation.
>
> So with two CQs by one station on the same band the station engaging in
> this practice takes up twice the space and denies others the use of the
> productive or limited space band.
>
> CQing on two bands is different because the other band may not be as
> productive, and even underused in low solar years.
>
> Ria
> N2RJ
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 3:58 PM john at kk9a.com <john at kk9a.com> wrote:
>
> > As far as spectrum usage goes what is the difference between this and a
> > single op CQing on two bands?
> >
> > KK9A
> >
> >
> > To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> > Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] PJ4G ARRL DX SSB Recording by N2IC
> > From: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu at w0mu.com>
> > Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 08:32:05 -0600
> >
> >
> > Jeff,
> >
> > Thanks for the comments. I agree with your interpretation of the rules, I
> > don't like that it is allowed and like many have asked the ARRL to close
> > this loophole.
> >
> > Many believe that if everyone adopted this philosophy that the band would
> > be a mess. People would have a very difficult time finding a place to CQ
> > unless you were a big gun etc.
> >
> > 73 and thanks for all the contacts from everywhere!
> >
> > W0MU
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>