[CQ-Contest] Robotic contest operating, why knot?

Alan M. Eshleman doctore at well.com
Tue Dec 18 19:27:19 EST 2018

anything can be rewritten--any system can be subverted.  

----- Original Message -----
From: Jim Brown <k9yc at audiosystemsgroup.com>
To: cq-contest <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 12:08:38 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Robotic contest operating, why knot?

On 12/18/2018 11:41 AM, Alan M. Eshleman wrote:
>   If I had an automated CQ (which doesn't seem that technically difficult) that would have been a fully computer controlled QSO.  What am I missing here?

WSJT-X was intentionally written so that operator intervention is 
required before you can have another QSO.

73, Jim K9YC
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com

More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list