[CQ-Contest] Robotic contest operating, why knot?

Peter Voelpel dj7ww at t-online.de
Tue Dec 18 20:13:47 EST 2018

As far that intervention is just a mouse click it can easily be replaced by
a macro.
And if you watch the bands you will find plenty of those FT-8 robots.

Peter, DJ7WW

-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jim
Sent: Dienstag, 18. Dezember 2018 21:09
To: cq-contest
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Robotic contest operating, why knot?

On 12/18/2018 11:41 AM, Alan M. Eshleman wrote:
>   If I had an automated CQ (which doesn't seem that technically difficult)
that would have been a fully computer controlled QSO.  What am I missing

WSJT-X was intentionally written so that operator intervention is required
before you can have another QSO.

73, Jim K9YC
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com

More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list