[CQ-Contest] Robotic contest operating, why knot?

[Chuck Dietz]

A robotic QSO isn’t much different than a guest op QSO.

Chuck W5PR

On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 9:23 PM Peter Voelpel <dj7ww at t-online.de> wrote:

> As far that intervention is just a mouse click it can easily be replaced by
> a macro.
> And if you watch the bands you will find plenty of those FT-8 robots.
>
> 73
> Peter, DJ7WW
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of
> Jim
> Brown
> Sent: Dienstag, 18. Dezember 2018 21:09
> To: cq-contest
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Robotic contest operating, why knot?
>
> On 12/18/2018 11:41 AM, Alan M. Eshleman wrote:
> >   If I had an automated CQ (which doesn't seem that technically
> difficult)
> that would have been a fully computer controlled QSO.  What am I missing
> here?
>
> WSJT-X was intentionally written so that operator intervention is required
> before you can have another QSO.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>