[CQ-Contest] SS Multi-Op

[Joe]

The Multi Low power, some sections you could make 1 contact and take 
first place.
Joe WB9SSBD
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 3/21/2018 8:00 AM, Steve London wrote:
> WB9SBD may have a point.
>
> It's a little tedious gathering a complete set of data, but here's 
> some spot checks:
>
> 2017 SS CW - 34 multi-op entries (M and ML categories combined)
> 1997 SS CW - 88 multi-op entries. This number does not include M 
> entries which were actually 1 operator, but were using packet spots. 
> 1997 was before the U category was created.
>
> 73,
> Steve, N2IC
>
> On 03/20/2018 08:16 PM, Art Boyars wrote:
>> WB9SBD: " Speaking of Multi-Op, Why does it seem that multi-op 
>> efforts in
>> SS have all but vanished?"
>>
>> Gee, my impression is that it was growing.  I think when I got started
>> mid-1960s there were very few Multi-Ops.  The calls K5LZO and W5ASP 
>> come to
>> mind.  Maybe they were the prominent/dominant team.
>>
>> Somebody with more time and interest can do the research.
>>
>> If M-O is, in fact, decreasing, then maybe it's because the load-sharing
>> that a not-hyper-competitive op used to do with M-O is now done with
>> click-and-log.
>>
>> ("Assisted/Unlimited" may be in some ways easier than plain Single 
>> Op, but
>> once people start competing in it, you have to work just as hard to win.
>> It's just the skills that are different.)
>>
>> 73, Art K3KU
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>