[CQ-Contest] FT4 - Robotic Contesting
Doug Renwick
ve5ra at sasktel.net
Tue Apr 30 18:23:52 EDT 2019
I consider all FT modes to be the ultimate CB of amateur radio.
Doug
"The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits."
Albert Einstein
-----Original Message-----
> I am not sure how many people are aware of a new FT mode that was just
released. The mode called FT-4 has a few new features.
>
> The first is that its quicker by trading S/N capture algorithm for speed
of contacts. I read somewhere there is a 10db price to pay on the weak
signal capability.
>
> The second is it allows for more flexibility of contest exchanges.
>
> The third is disturbing. It allows for an automated feature that decides
the best contact available of the decoded possibilities (like a new mult)
and just goes for it automatically. The operator doesn't click on the call,
the operator clicks on the desire to find the best call.
>
> Because of the simplistic possibility of having a screen macro just keep
clicking on "find the best call", a feeble attempt to thwart full robotic
capability is made to swap the button on the screen with the cancel button.
Although this is NOT done after every QSO but only after "a few QSOs"
whatever that means. So even with this attempt, the acceptance of a few
automated and optimized QSOs has been declared acceptable. Just not 100%
fully robotic. Although whether this attempt to move buttons actually
prevents a macro from engaging the button is not assured to me. People more
knowledgably on such things can comment.
>
> I hope that the Contest community is watching this slippery slope slide.
Fire up FT4, decode the signals in the pass band, Automatically find a few
and work them without the operator even knowing which ones are being
worked. Seriously, what is the point? If a robot war contest is desired, I
am all for it and think it's a cool concept. But we don't put 6 year olds
in the ring to fight with robots in robowars and we shouldn't be mixing the
two in contesting either.
>
> Contesters ignore this disturbing trend and acceptance by sponsors at
their peril in my opinion.
>
> 73
>
> Ed N1UR
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list