[CQ-Contest] Station Re-Build - Coax

Wayne Kline w3ea at hotmail.com
Tue Mar 12 23:35:57 EDT 2019


I third  the sugjestion of the RG400   small enough for  all the switching   in a more then one radio setup.

The  tight bend radius the  small diameter make for a clean instlation that coupled with the double shielding   it’s a WIN WIN

Watch  Ebay or other surplus suppliers



Wayne W3EA



Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10



________________________________
From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com> on behalf of charlie carroll <k1xx at k1xx.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 10:23:06 PM
To: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Re-Build - Coax

Keith:
A couple very similar candidate cables are RG-400 and RG-303. RG-400 is
double shielded while 303 is single.  They're good as interconnects
because they have a small bend radius (about 1"). RG-400 uses
multi-strands of copper for the center conductor; RG-300 uses copper
clad steel.  Either will handle 1500 watts at HF.

73 charlie, k1xx

On 3/12/2019 7:51 PM, Keith Dutson wrote:
> My multi-two station, with third spotting station, is being rebuilt into new
> digs.  I have a lot of 3-4 foot RG213 cables running between the amp, power
> meter, tuner and switch.  I have heard there may be a smaller cable that has
> very little loss, but handles 1500 watts.  I would appreciate any comments
> on what is being used today.  Thanks.
>
> 73, Keith NM5G
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list