[CQ-Contest] Station Re-Build - Coax

N4ZR n4zr at comcast.net
Wed Mar 13 09:51:25 EDT 2019


I just bought 10 feet of RG-400U (supposedly Harbour Industries) through 
E-bay for $13.  Belatedly, I learned it was coming from China.  It's now 
here, but I don't think it is for real - it only has one shield, and is 
somewhat stiff.  At least the inner conductor isn't magnetic.There's no 
printing on the cable.

Buyer beware.


73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network
at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now
spotting RTTY activity worldwide.
For spots, please use your favorite
"retail" DX cluster.

On 3/12/2019 11:35 PM, Wayne Kline wrote:
> I third  the sugjestion of the RG400   small enough for  all the switching   in a more then one radio setup.
>
> The  tight bend radius the  small diameter make for a clean instlation that coupled with the double shielding   it’s a WIN WIN
>
> Watch  Ebay or other surplus suppliers
>
>
>
> Wayne W3EA
>
>
>
> Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com> on behalf of charlie carroll <k1xx at k1xx.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 10:23:06 PM
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Re-Build - Coax
>
> Keith:
> A couple very similar candidate cables are RG-400 and RG-303. RG-400 is
> double shielded while 303 is single.  They're good as interconnects
> because they have a small bend radius (about 1"). RG-400 uses
> multi-strands of copper for the center conductor; RG-300 uses copper
> clad steel.  Either will handle 1500 watts at HF.
>
> 73 charlie, k1xx
>
> On 3/12/2019 7:51 PM, Keith Dutson wrote:
>> My multi-two station, with third spotting station, is being rebuilt into new
>> digs.  I have a lot of 3-4 foot RG213 cables running between the amp, power
>> meter, tuner and switch.  I have heard there may be a smaller cable that has
>> very little loss, but handles 1500 watts.  I would appreciate any comments
>> on what is being used today.  Thanks.
>>
>> 73, Keith NM5G
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>


More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list