[CQ-Contest] Serial number, contact sending speed

Barry w2up at comcast.net
Wed Mar 13 22:47:05 EDT 2019


I recall a CQWW CW 10+ years ago where I was dinged for a busted call.  
I had recorded the contest and went back to listen to the exchange.  The 
guy sent his own call wrong!  I sent the audio snippet to one of the 
CQWW committee guys for comment.  It didn't affect any standings, so 
nothing was done with it.

Moral of the story - you can to everything right and still lose points.

Barry W2UP

On 3/13/2019 4:50 PM, yuri wrote:
> Actually, it was after I received a UBN for the 2001 Russian DX 
> Contest when I decided to change my very good VA3UZ call for current - 
> available at that moment (and not-so-good) VE3DZ. A couple of hundreds 
> guys logged me as "UA3UZ" due to some smart DX cluster spotters.
>
> I remember one year some W7 guy used to spot deliberately wrong calls 
> in the ARRL DX CW. And if you are not assisted, the only way to 
> suspect (even not to "know") that something is wrong is when all of a 
> sudden you start to work a lot of dupes.
>
> So, what does it have to do with accuracy of sending by the CQ'er??? I 
> have no idea why so many of you are in awe of RDXC, and why 2nd WRTC 
> in a row decided to give this contest a highest mark for selection 
> process putting it in the same row with CQ WW's...
>
> Again, penalizing an operator for something he's never done - what 
> could be more dumber? Then let the organizers change the exchange 
> procedure - make it an obligation for both guys to transmit both 
> calls, or make it similar to Sprint exchange... But like I said, even 
> that might not help.
>
> And don't forget that if you work a lot of uniques in this Contest - 
> for instance, staying over 14225 for General Class operators, these 
> contacts will be removed too.
>
> Yuri  VE3DZ
>
> On 3/13/2019 12:04 PM, rjairam at gmail.com wrote:
>> What if the other person not sure, deletes your call from their log?
>> You end up losing that QSO.
>>
>> I don't have insight into log checking but I'd imagine that if the
>> computer can determine that the call was busted, one side would get
>> the Q credit - for example copying 6Y1V as BY1V, 6Y1V still gets the
>> credit. If it's completely off like copying W1VE as HB9/DL1ABC (due to
>> bad cluster spot) that you may lose the QSO point...
>>
>> Ria
>> N2RJ
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list