[CQ-Contest] Station Re-Build - Coax
Wayne Kline
w3ea at hotmail.com
Thu Mar 14 09:24:49 EDT 2019
Pete,
I am holding in my hand two manufacturs M17/128 RG-400 MR -C-17G 12814 Thermax RGS 400 and ALPHA MIL-C-17/1288 M17/128-RG 400
There Not supple stiff , not flexable like RG8X . The cable is STIFF but can be bent in to a 2” dia loop. At 1 “ can be done but IMO not a good practice.
The 8” in coil YIKES that’s stiff ?
YMMV
Wayne W3EA
Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10
________________________________
From: N4ZR <n4zr at comcast.net>
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 8:48:38 AM
To: Wayne Kline; charlie carroll; cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Re-Build - Coax
Oops. I did some more dissecting on the cable, and I'm wrong about the shielding. That leaves only the absence of printing - this is advertised as Harbour Industries RG-400 - and its stiffness. This stuff is quite hard to bend in even an 8" coil. Can anyone who has used real RG-400 confirm whether it feels supple and flexible to the touch? I have one jumper in my station that looks like the same stuff, but which is very supple. I bought it at Dayton a few years aho, already connectorized. I can believe a 1" minimum bend radius with it, but not with the stuff from China.
73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network
at <http://reversebeacon.net><http://reversebeacon.net>, now
spotting RTTY activity worldwide.
For spots, please use your favorite
"retail" DX cluster.
On 3/13/2019 9:51 AM, N4ZR wrote:
I just bought 10 feet of RG-400U (supposedly Harbour Industries) through E-bay for $13. Belatedly, I learned it was coming from China. It's now here, but I don't think it is for real - it only has one shield, and is somewhat stiff. At least the inner conductor isn't magnetic.There's no printing on the cable.
Buyer beware.
73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network
at <http://reversebeacon.net><http://reversebeacon.net>, now
spotting RTTY activity worldwide.
For spots, please use your favorite
"retail" DX cluster.
On 3/12/2019 11:35 PM, Wayne Kline wrote:
I third the sugjestion of the RG400 small enough for all the switching in a more then one radio setup.
The tight bend radius the small diameter make for a clean instlation that coupled with the double shielding it’s a WIN WIN
Watch Ebay or other surplus suppliers
Wayne W3EA
Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986><https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10
________________________________
From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com><mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com> on behalf of charlie carroll <k1xx at k1xx.com><mailto:k1xx at k1xx.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 10:23:06 PM
To: cq-contest at contesting.com<mailto:cq-contest at contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Station Re-Build - Coax
Keith:
A couple very similar candidate cables are RG-400 and RG-303. RG-400 is
double shielded while 303 is single. They're good as interconnects
because they have a small bend radius (about 1"). RG-400 uses
multi-strands of copper for the center conductor; RG-300 uses copper
clad steel. Either will handle 1500 watts at HF.
73 charlie, k1xx
On 3/12/2019 7:51 PM, Keith Dutson wrote:
My multi-two station, with third spotting station, is being rebuilt into new
digs. I have a lot of 3-4 foot RG213 cables running between the amp, power
meter, tuner and switch. I have heard there may be a smaller cable that has
very little loss, but handles 1500 watts. I would appreciate any comments
on what is being used today. Thanks.
73, Keith NM5G
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com<mailto:CQ-Contest at contesting.com>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com<mailto:CQ-Contest at contesting.com>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com<mailto:CQ-Contest at contesting.com>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list