[CQ-Contest] sunspot cycle

[Steve London]

You're right about the flux numbers. I have been keeping track of these things 
for 4 minimums. 65 is the lowest I remember.

73,
Steve, N2IC

On 03/24/2019 01:24 PM, Bill kollenbaum via CQ-Contest wrote:
> The post was not about the demise of contesting, it was about sunspots numbers and propagation.  If you look at the numbers, they predict a flux consistently in the 50s.  I can't remember ever seeing a number that low. We have been banging around 70  or so for most of this year, with a few exception like those right now (around 80).  Almost everyone seems to agree, that at that number conditions are not very good
> Of course we will always have some bands open,  but if the null in the sunspots continue through 2022 it is generally thought that this cycle will be extremely low at the peak since there is a direct correlation between the length of the minimum and the strength of the next cycle.
> This may or may not have an effect on contesting.  However, it is pretty easy to see that it has had an effect on daily operating.
> KH7XS,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
> Bill,
> 
> You have made other statements about the demise of contesting. It's not happening.
> 
> For example, 2900 QSO's from New Mexico in ARRL DX CW a few weekends ago. No
> sunspots. Great fun.
> 
> 73,
> Steve, N2IC
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>