[CQ-Contest] Scary

[Joe]

The Rookie Roundup is dismal! It is NOTHING like the Novice Roundup of 
like the 70's
Participation levels are soo low, that a pretty good portion of the 
sections, you can make just one contact and take first place because no 
one enters in from there.

When the ARRL thought about bringing this contest back, I wish they kept 
the same old format of like 9 or 10 days operating window, but still 
only use 124 to 30 hours of operating time.

Just modernize it with the new modes that a newly licensed person can 
use.  IE: 3 Modes CW, SSB, Digital.
And like Field Day you can work them on each band and each mode.

Same with Mults each band and mode to encourage people to try different 
bands and modes.

Joe WB9SBD

That would have been a BLAST
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 11/4/2019 10:20 PM, John Geiger wrote:
> How many rookie operators are showing up in the CW version of the Rookie
> Roundup?  That might give us a good indication of what the expect in the CW
> SS in years to come.
>
> 73 John W5TD
>
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 9:41 PM AB2E Darrell <ab2e at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Pete,
>> Good point about the new ops showing up.
>> It's been 3 or 4 years since I operated SS CW more than just a couple
>> hours.
>> I noticed quite a few CKs from 00-18. Also quite a number of ops coming
>> back to my CQ at between 17-21 WPM.
>> While I like to typically operate at 30+wpm in contests, I try to slow
>> down for the slower ops that came back.
>> I think it will help them hang in there. Sometimes I just slowed down
>> some, like to 24 or 25 so as to still challenge them and hopefully help
>> improve their speed.
>>
>> There seems to be some attrition in the diehard 24hour high-speed
>> operators, but perhaps that;s my imagination.
>> I'm thinking back to the 90s and 80s when on Sunday afternoon a lot of
>> operators had 1000+ QSO counts, only worked a few of those on Sun this
>> year, and one of those was Multi.
>>
>> 73 Darrell AB2E
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com> on behalf of N4ZR <
>> n4zr at comcast.net>
>> Sent: Monday, November 4, 2019 5:44 PM
>> To: cq-contest at contesting.com <cq-contest at contesting.com>
>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Scary
>>
>> The one I got from the N1MM site had over 10,000.  I was surprised by
>> how many people weren't in it.  My theory, at least, is that there's a
>> little new blood every year, and a good thing.  Too many checks in the 50s.
>>
>> 73, Pete N4ZR
>> Check out the Reverse Beacon Network
>> at <http://reversebeacon.net>, now
>> spotting RTTY activity worldwide.
>> For spots, please use your favorite
>> "retail" DX cluster.
>>
>> On 11/4/2019 1:09 PM, Radio KØHB wrote:
>>> I loaded a “call history” file into N1MM+ for this weekends SS CW.
>>>
>>> Out of over 500 contacts, just seven were NOT in that file.  Five of
>> them had checks from the last century.
>>> 73, de Hans, KØHB
>>> "Just a boy and his radio"™
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>> [https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-green-avg-v1.png
>> ]<
>> http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
>>     Virus-free. www.avg.com<
>> http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest