[CQ-Contest] CQM Adjudication
Jim Rhodes
jimk0xu at gmail.com
Mon May 11 16:43:27 EDT 2020
Seems to me that one of the contest put on by a Japanese group used to be
scored this way. I never participated in that particular contest, but that
wasn't the reason why.
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 11:26 AM Paul O'Kane <pokane at ei5di.com> wrote:
> On 11/05/2020 12:38, Shelby K4WW wrote:
> > "Judging is carried out only on the received LOGs = if a participant
> > doesn’t submit the log, then other participants will have no QSO point
> nor
> > multiplier point credits for the QSOs with him!"
> >
> > As this was a "first time ever" to actually participate, not just make a
> > few contacts, I find the unique approach toward scoring, indefensible?
>
> Contest sponsors are entitled to define whatever rules they choose.
> This one is an incentive for casual operators to submit a log, as
> otherwise they are wasting other entrants' time. Who would want to do
> that? :-)
>
> 73,
> Paul EI5DI
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
--
Jim K0XU
jim at rhodesend.net
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list