[CQ-Contest] Spacing note for RBN users

[Joe]

Hello Pete,

Two questions.

Does Farnsworth spacing's have any effect?  I like to run my letter 
speed at 25 to 30 wpm, but the say "Word" speed at 20 to 25 wpm.

and

Varying spacing's, Like our club call W9ET if i run it "as is" I get a 
LOT more repeats.

But in like N1MM+ if I use W9~e~T  insert the half spacings, I almost 
never ever get any repeat requests.

One More I havent tried it yet, but to emphasize the "T" in the call,  
say I'm running at 25 wpm,  but just for the "T" I drop to 20 or even 15 
to emphasize that it is a dash. and make it really obvious the 
difference between the "E & "T"

Joe WB9SBD

On 4/22/2021 9:35 AM, N4ZR wrote:
> When trying to decode callsigns for the RBN, the CW Skimmer Server 
> software developed by VE3NEA relies on proper CW spacing to determine 
> what is part of a callsign and what isn't.  This can result in 
> problems in contests where abbreviations of the contest name are 
> commonly part of the CQ and sent just before the callsign.  For 
> example, "CWT" is often run together with the sender's callsign, 
> resulting in spots of K4 stations with prefixes like "TK4". "WW", 
> "MM", and other contest abbreviations, when run together with the 
> sender's callsign, can have a similar effect. The resulting spurious 
> spots can replace what should be good spots - for example in the 
> Available and Bandmap windows in N1MM+ - so it would be very much in 
> senders' interest to correct their spacing if they see this happening.
>