[CQ-Contest] You gotta let me know, should M/M Distributed stay or go.
lu5dx at lucg.com.ar
Fri Jun 4 21:49:44 EDT 2021
Actually, after some time in this hobby of ours, you would get more
enjoyment if not competing for anything at all.
Thankfully, that is what around 95% of the entrants do.
Those are the ones who really matter, since without them, we would only be
a bunch of (hard to describe) radio aficionados racking up small scores.
El vie., 4 jun. 2021 10:27 p. m., Jeff Clarke <ku8e at ku8e.com> escribió:
> I would have a lot more fun in contests if there was a WIRES-ONLY
> category and I could compete for something. Hey CQ can you create a
> category for me too? I doubt I would even get a response from them
> because I'm not as connected as the person(s) who pushed them to add a
> MM Distributed category.
> BTW I'm just being sarcastic. Don't take my comments seriously.
> On 6/4/2021 11:32 AM, john at kk9a.com wrote:
> > here were only 21 M/M Distributed stations that have loaded their CQ
> > WPX CW logs so I agree that in only has a minimal effect on the
> > available stations to work. If the ops have fun in that category it's
> > great. I am guessing that each operator would have less opportunity to
> > make QSOs compared to them operating from three separate multi-multi
> > stations that were using DIFFERENT callsigns.
> > John KK9A - P40A in 2021 WPX Phone and CW
> > Ken AB1J wrote:
> > And I fail to see how the M/M Distributed category can have a
> > noticeable effect on the number of stations that can be worked. The
> > sky is not falling.
> > 73,
> > Ken, AB1J
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest