[CQ-Contest] FOC QP

[David Gilbert]

Does FOC official scoring check the signal report?  Some contests don't 
bother.  Just asking ... I don't know either way.

73,
Dave   AB7E




On 3/26/2022 5:40 PM, Hans Brakob wrote:
> That is all well and good, Peter, but my point is that they didn’t just play “I Robot” and send 5NN.  You actually had to pay attention and copy what was sent, unlike “modern” robot contests like CQWW.
>
> 73, de Hans, KØHB
> “Just a Boy and his Radio”™

> ________________________________
> From: CQ-Contest <cq-contest-bounces+kzerohb=gmail.com at contesting.com> on behalf of Peter Voelpel <dj7ww at t-online.de>
> Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2022 4:14 PM
> To: 'CQ-Contest' <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] FOC QP
>
> Must be very difficult to find a transceiver with a real S-meter.
> I never had one, they all showed numbers far from the truth.
>
> 73
> Peter, DJ7WW
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CQ-Contest
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces+dj7ww=t-online.de at contesting.com] On Behalf Of
> Hans Brakob
> Sent: Samstag, 26. März 2022 16:55
> To: CQ-Contest
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] FOC QP
>
> Made a couple dozen contacts in the FOC QSO party last night (I’m not a
> member.)
>
> Two things that I noticed.
>
> They’re a friendly crowd.   They give real signal reports, like 579 and 549.
>
> 73, de Hans, KØHB
> “Just a Boy and his Radio”™
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest