[ct-user] Grabbing packet spots to a TS940

[Mike Gilmer - N2MG]

I use the TS-940 also, doing a lot of part-time SO-assisted operating.  So I've tried just about everything WRT radio-control/packet-grabbing.  I've experienced several anomolies or curiosities that I've written about to the reflector in the past.

Search in the archives for my posts, especially in the months of and immdiately following the last two years' worth of CQWW and ARRL.  For example:

http://lists.contesting.com/_ct-user/200003/msg00004.html

See if you can recreate what I've documented.  I always try very hard to be VERY specific so that others can recreate the events easily - otherwise bug reporting is next to worthless.

I cannot say that I have seen your problem, specifically - my VFO-B is *usually* left alone on a non-split spot.

73 Mike N2MG



On Mon, 16 October 2000, kd2p@att.net wrote:

> 
> 
> I have encountered an annoying problem when grabbing 
> packet spots to my TS940 from CT 9.47.  
> 
> When grabbing packet spots with a split frequency, no 
> problem.  However, when no split frequency is spotted, 
> my TS940's VFO A is set to the spotted frequency and VFO 
> B is set to 14000, no matter what band the spot or radio 
> is on.  Is there a way to prevent VFO B from 
> being "reset" to a potentially out-of-mode and nearly 
> out-of-band situation?
> 
> I would like to have only one of the VFOs set if there 
> is no split advertised or have both VFOs set to the same 
> frequency, if there is no way to change the command 
> string.  
> 
> Pat, KD2P

________________________________________________
PeoplePC:  It's for people. And it's just smart. 
http://www.peoplepc.com 

--
WWW:                      http://www.k1ea.com/
Submissions:              ct-user@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  ct-user-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-ct-user@contesting.com