[Mldxcc] Fw: [NCCC] ARRL 10M

[Norm Wilson]

I intend to operate in the 160 and 10 meter contest for MLDXCC.  My
understanding was that we would also do the RTTY/RU for MLDXCC and not
NCCC.


NOTE: Scores for CQWW CW are due today.  Get you scores to me.

Norm

N6JV at N6JV.com
http://N6JV.com  (MUSEUM)


-----Original Message-----
From: Mldxcc [mailto:mldxcc-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of SHIRLEY
ROSE
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 6:43 AM
To: MLDXCC
Subject: [Mldxcc] Fw: [NCCC] ARRL 10M

So where are we???  Are we going to do the 10 M and RTTY/RU as MLDXCC or
not???

Shirl/AA6K


On Wednesday, December 3, 2014 3:24 PM, Dick Wilson <k6lrn12 at gmail.com>
wrote:
 


Last year we were 10th in Medium category with 4.9 mil + points in ARRL
10M. Added to NCCC score makes it 3rd instead of 5th.
IMO, difficult to compete against east coast due to population density.
Once band is 'closed', they can work a lot on ground wave
      &
scatter.
Also, IMO, we ought to make some sort of determination as to which contests
we do emphasize. 
According to NCCC's contest calendar, club has RTTY RU as a
      'focus'
event. MLDXCC also has it as a 'focus' event. Not much has been
      said
by NCCC that I have heard. IMO, we need to make a determination
      well
ahead, publicize and coordinate so that people can make a choice.
      I

 
On 12/3/2014 1:36 PM, Robert Hess via NCCC wrote:

I like your idea, Bill.  MLDXCC members usually do this contest, but it is
not one of our focus contests.  
>
>
>The big one for MLDXCC will be ARRL RU in January.  I'm sure the MLDXCC
members would specify NCCC on their ARRL 10M logs if we want to make a run
at this one.
>
>
>Bob
>W1RH
>
>
>________________________________
> From: Bill Haddon <haddon.bill at gmail.com>
>To: NCCC <nccc at contesting.com>
>Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2014 2:13 PM
>Subject: [NCCC] ARRL 10M
> 
>
>
>The ARRL 10m contest is Dec 12-14, weekend after next.
>
>
>NCCC could be very competitive or win. From last year (with no particular
NCCC 'push'):
>
>
>PVRC (Unlimited winner)
>
>125 logs     33,720,000 pts  
>
>
>NCCC+MLDXCC+REDXA
>
>87 logs       21,312,000 pts.
>
>
>I went through the 2013 SS logs, looking for stations that ran SS but not
ARRL 10m.  Result:
>
>36 additional stations with 4.9M pts
>[counting only one mode (i.e. if the no-10m station
                    competed in two SS modes, I counted points for only
                    one mode)]
>
>
>Assuming:
>
>  -- Each of the 36 added stations could achieve 2X their single-mode 
> SS score [see note at end] in the 10M contest,
>
>     + 9.8M points.
>
>  -- For those who did ARRL 10, assume a 15% greater effort, adding + 3.3M
points.
>
>
>Total projected points for NCCC in 2013, had we made such an effort:   
>
>     21.3M + 3.3M + 9.8M  = 34.4M
>
>
>for a 1st place finish in Unlimited category.
>
>
>73 Bill n6zfo
>
>
>Note:  In 2013 my own total SS effort was about 320,000 pts; but 760,000
in ARRL 10m, so the x2 ratio is probably conservative.  Benefits of 10M
contest: mostly daylight hours; easier low power band vs. SS; simpler
exchange; modest antenna requirements.
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>NCCC mailing list  (http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/nccc)
>Post to: nccc at contesting.com - NEVER PUBLISH THIS ADDRESS Manage your 
>subscription at: http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/options/nccc
>Archives at: http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/private/nccc/
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
NCCC mailing list  (http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/nccc)
Post to: nccc at contesting.com - NEVER PUBLISH THIS ADDRESS Manage your
subscription at: http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/options/nccc Archives
at: http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/private/nccc/
_______________________________________________
Mldxcc mailing list
Mldxcc at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/mldxcc