[RFI] RFI mitigation and prevention [was: led bulbs?]
eddieedwards at centurylink.net
Sat Oct 1 11:57:05 EDT 2016
I agree Mike. The toilet water flush reference is way off topic.
The solar-nuclear reference (also off topic from LED bulbs) is a bit closer to root cause of the problem needing to replace shrinking power generation with supposedly clean renewables. The more solar systems installed to do this, the more we'll face new RFI problems next to our ham stations. We could "mitigate" this new RFI threat through normal means of time and expense normally mentioned here, or find other creative ways to avoid it's RFI growth no matter the politics. It's all RFI mitigation or prevention in the end.
73, de ed -K0iL
From: RFI [mailto:rfi-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Michael Coslo
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 1:33 PM
To: Rfi at contesting.com List
Subject: Re: [RFI] led bulbs?
I’m here for RFI mitigation, and not politics. Good day sir.
-73 de Mike N3LI -
> On Sep 30, 2016, at 12:44 PM, Wes Stewart via RFI <rfi at contesting.com> wrote:
> It's not shiny new, but I have one a hundred miles or so from me. You would have to pave half of AZ with solar cells to equal its output.
> The federal government has no business doing about 90% of what it does. Where in the Constitution does it mention how much water my toilet should use per flush?
> From: Michael Coslo <mcoslo at comcast.net>
> The problem of course, is that no one wants that shiny new nuc power plant in their backyard.
RFI mailing list
RFI at contesting.com
More information about the RFI