[RFI] RFI mitigation and prevention [was: led bulbs?]

[Roger (K8RI)]

Many are missing the point that regulations are often misplaced, or 
inadequately applied.
In the case of RFI mitigation, the user is responsible for the 
individual case, but the regulations need to be enforced against the 
installer (for following recommended procedures) seller and manufacturer.
If the seller is held accountable, they will cease purchasing from that 
manufacturer. If the manufacturer is held accountable for actual 
interference rather than just passing a set radiation limit under 
controlled conditions, they "might" become a bit more conscientious.

The toilet is a good example of regulations and last I read we were 
talking about "regulations", their implementation and effectiveness.  
There the onus is on the manufacturer, so why can't it be the same with 
RFI? As I read the regs, that ability to do so is there.

73

Roger (K8RI)


On 10/1/2016 Saturday 11:57 AM, Ed K0iL wrote:
> I agree Mike.  The toilet water flush reference is way off topic.
>
> The solar-nuclear reference (also off topic from LED bulbs) is a bit closer to root cause of the problem needing to replace shrinking power generation with supposedly clean renewables.  The more solar systems installed to do this, the more we'll face new RFI problems next to our ham stations.  We could "mitigate" this new RFI threat through normal means of time and expense normally mentioned here, or find other creative ways to avoid it's RFI growth no matter the politics.  It's all RFI mitigation or prevention in the end.
>
> 73, de ed -K0iL
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: RFI [mailto:rfi-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Michael Coslo
> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 1:33 PM
> To: Rfi at contesting.com List
> Subject: Re: [RFI] led bulbs?
>
> I’m here for RFI mitigation, and not politics. Good day sir.
>
> -73 de Mike N3LI -
>
>> On Sep 30, 2016, at 12:44 PM, Wes Stewart via RFI <rfi at contesting.com> wrote:
>>
>> It's not shiny new, but I have one a hundred miles or so from me.  You would have to pave half of AZ with solar cells to equal its output.
>> The federal government has no business doing about 90% of what it does. Where in the Constitution does it mention how much water my toilet should use per flush?
>>
>> From: Michael Coslo <mcoslo at comcast.net>
>>
>> The problem of course, is that no one wants that shiny new nuc power plant in their backyard.
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus