[RFI] Optimizers & thje FCC

[Martin Sole]

Hello Dave,

That's unfair! Hi-hi. But I'm curious about your tale, mostly because I 
work in aviation nav/com and have seen involvement in interference 
issues climb rapidly over the last few years. So I have a professional 
interest, as well as always enjoying a good story :)

Martin, HS0ZED



On 14/07/2018 06:50, David Eckhardt wrote:
> Good thought!  The FAA does NOT.......*N  O  T.*......tolerate interference!
>
> I have a story to tell about FAA and a local "trial" of BPL a few years
> back, but too long for this forum.  The outcome was FAA slapping FCC in no
> uncertain terms.  Some of the information as to how it all went down is a
> bit sensitive, so only in person, please.  It all happened in our little
> farming town in Northern Colorado and "Denver Center" for FAA.
>
> Dave - WØLEV
>
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 10:58 PM, Leonard Halvorsen <lhalvors at pppl.gov>
> wrote:
>
>> About a week ago a past e-mail from an FCC official was repeated in this
>> forum, which *asked for *information/complaints regarding RFI from solar
>> installations. I read, almost every day, about problems with these devices,
>> but I never see anyone reporting their progress with that official at the
>> FCC. Has everyone thrown in the towel?
>>
>> One last suggestion...
>> When you're listening to RFI, determine if it's audible (or visible on your
>> spectrum display) in the 108 to 120 MHz. band. If it is, send an e-mail to
>> the FCC ASAP, with your data. The FCC will absolutely NOT tolerate RFI in
>> the Aviation Radio Navigation Band.
>>
>> If you cc: your e-mail to the FAA, that will REALLY light a fire under
>> someones' office chair.
>>
>> lh
>> wa2amw
>> _______________________________________________
>> RFI mailing list
>> RFI at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>>
>
>