[RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System

[Hare, Ed, W1RFI]

Here is the list of the statements from the FCC Chair. I didn't see anything in the titles that looked as if it might contain the statement that Randy read, but maybe if he looks at the list, it will jog his memory.  It would be important to see that in context.

https://www.fcc.gov/about/leadership/jessica-rosenworcel#statements
Jessica Rosenworcel | Federal Communications Commission<https://www.fcc.gov/about/leadership/jessica-rosenworcel#statements>
Federal Communications Commission Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel believes that the future belongs to the connected. She works to promote greater opportunity, accessibility, and affordability in our communications services in order to ensure that all Americans get a fair shot at 21st century success.
www.fcc.gov

________________________________
From: RFI <rfi-bounces+w1rfi=arrl.org at contesting.com> on behalf of Michael Carter <Mike.Carter at unh.edu>
Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2022 3:09 PM
To: wx5l at arrl.net <wx5l at charter.net>; rfi at contesting.com <rfi at contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System

No flames, Randy - just a request for the source
of the statement attributed to Ms. Rosenworcel,
the FCC chairperson.  I can't believe any FCC
senior appointee would make a qualitative or
quantitative assessment of interference potential/severity of any
unintentional RF emitter.

Thanks in advance, and 73,
Mike, K8CN
________________________________
From: RFI <rfi-bounces+mike.carter=unh.edu at contesting.com> on behalf of wx5l at charter.net <wx5l at charter.net>
Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2022 2:56 PM
To: rfi at contesting.com <rfi at contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RFI] Another Solar Panel RFI System

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the University System. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.


There have been comments that the ARRL has the FCC's ear. Really do they?

Recently Jessica Rosenworcel , FCC chairwomen has made a statement about
issues with Solar Edge RFI and said that S-6 to S-9 is NOT harmful
interference. On what basis can she make that determination. Does she know
what an S unit is?  Has she been advised from a technical support group to
make that comment?

The FCC's should not label harmful interference with an S-meters reference.

I would be confident to say of there would be s-6 interference to a fire
department, ambulance service or aircraft control tower that would not be
tolerated but as amateurs we must tolerate it in the eyes of the FCC.

Now let the flame throwers commence.

73,

Randy
WX5L

_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI at contesting.com
https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.contesting.com%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Frfi&data=05%7C01%7Cmike.carter%40unh.edu%7C8c813307d8814269428308dae1322fcb%7Cd6241893512d46dc8d2bbe47e25f5666%7C0%7C0%7C638069902910615128%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=mRSPgf5cwCtZa3qurAk42EJotNF3K0v4Iemg6KGmM5I%3D&reserved=0
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi