[RTTY] single op, 1 radio, 2 recvrs

[Joe Subich, W4TV]

Bob, 

> Is it the need to have a lot of "chad" in the box? If you're 
> Top Ten out of 1,500 competitors maybe that "feels" a lot 
> better than "Top Ten" out of 300 competitors? I say, let the 
> other 1200 operators compete with their "similar kind" and 
> not be run over by the steamrollers. This will help promote 
> the radiosport. 

The walk-on freshman running back at The Ohio State University 
does not expect to start his first game (although he might at 
the University of Minnesota <G>), he's happy if he makes the 
traveling squad.  He understands that it takes time to develop 
his skills to compete at the top level.  He works extra in the 
weight room, he runs extra, he works with strength and quickness 
coaches, he learns to cut left and right with equal ease and to 
never give an opposing linebacker any indication of his next 
move.   

The walk-on may never make first string but understands that 
by giving more than he thinks he has, he is making the effort 
and contributing to the team effort.  Once in a while, the 
walk-on has enough talent, makes that effort and rises to the 
top tier of the sport but he certainly doesn't do it with only 
half-way measures.  Those who choose to compete understand 
that there are 100, 500, 1500 others in the same position 
competing for the same "top ten" and do their best.  They may 
realize that they don't have what it takes to win a Heisman 
but are happy if they make that traveling squad, the three 
deep, or earn a scholarship by the time they are a junior. 

Each participant in a competitive environment knows the rules 
going in ... they set their own goals and choose their own 
level of commitment.  There is no reason that the competition 
should be so diluted and/or so fragmented that like elementary 
school soccer every child gets a gold medal just for showing 
up.  

Why should a walk-on be named an All-American just for entering 
the practice facility?  Why should "All-American" status be 
depreciated by creating so many categories that every player 
becomes "All-American" (Top Ten) at something?  Slicing and 
dicing the field into ever smaller categories does nothing but 
devalue the completion for everybody. 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtty-bounces at contesting.com 
> [mailto:rtty-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Robert Chudek
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 10:13 PM
> To: rtty at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] single op, 1 radio, 2 recvrs
> 
> 
> Come on John, where did you get that from? I/We am NOT 
> objecting to SO2R. Not the least. It's a great skill to 
> develop. And a great advantage once you have a good handle on 
> it. SO2R elevates you to the top of the "pack". As a matter 
> of fact, one of the 2006 WRTC teams lost their second 
> receiver within hours of the start of the competition. In 
> their event summary, they confessed this effectively took 
> them out of the competition. What more endorsement do you 
> need that SO2R is a different class?
> 
> What I do object to is lumping everyone into the same 
> category. This situation does not help promote the 
> radiosport. Many real world comparisons have been shown that 
> "Single Operator" is not an exclusive qualifier. I don't need 
> to repeat them again. Some of the contest sponsors have 
> already recognized this and made adjustments. "Expert Class" 
> is one example of a step in the right direction. "Tribanders 
> and wires" is another example.
> 
> Is it the need to have a lot of "chad" in the box? If you're 
> Top Ten out of 1,500 competitors maybe that "feels" a lot 
> better than "Top Ten" out of 300 competitors? I say, let the 
> other 1200 operators compete with their "similar kind" and 
> not be run over by the steamrollers. This will help promote 
> the radiosport. Whether you're Top Ten out of 1,500, 300, or 
> 15... in my book you're Top Ten, period.
> 
> 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 6
> Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 21:16:22 -0400
> From: "John Fleming" <john at wa9als.com>
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] single op, 1 radio, 2 recvrs
> To: <rtty at contesting.com>
> Message-ID: <004c01c8105b$5589c620$0201a8c0 at wa9als>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=original
> 
> Ed, you hit on the most amazing thing.  The main objectors to 
> SO2R not being 
> in a different category have never tried it.  If they had, I 
> think the 
> objections would stop.  John, WA9ALS
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> 
>