[RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 62, Issue 47

[jim orlowski]

In regards to your  question  on how  long  does it take  to make it into
the  online log of vp6dx, i worked them on 17  ssb last  night  then  less
than 20 minutes later  got them on 20  rtty  then  got them on 12  ssb. took
about  12 hours  to show up on their online log.
JIm N8PUG

On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 5:00 PM, <rtty-request at contesting.com> wrote:

> Send RTTY mailing list submissions to
>        rtty at contesting.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        rtty-request at contesting.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        rtty-owner at contesting.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of RTTY digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: VP6DX (Jon Maguire)
>   2. Re: VP6DX (Steve AI9T)
>   3. Re: Notes on NAQP-LoTW-Maine (Ron DeBlock)
>   4. Re: Screenshots of PropNet interference? (George Henry)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 07:08:54 -0500
> From: Jon Maguire <w1mnk at tampabay.rr.com>
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] VP6DX
> To: rtty at contesting.com
> Message-ID: <47C40156.6020405 at tampabay.rr.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Guys, how long does it take a contact to make it into their online log?
> Thank you.
>
> 73... Jon W1MNK
>
> Lee Ratcliff wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > I lucked out, and copied the guy he was talking to.  Called once, and he
> got
> > me.  Worked him on 20 RTTY, and 12m SSB both tonight.  That's odd for
> after
> > dark here in VA.
> >
> > Sparky
> > KC4ART
> >
> >
> > -------Original Message-------
> >
> > From: Peter Laws
> > Date: 2/25/2008 7:53:58 PM
> > To: RTTY
> > Subject: [RTTY] VP6DX
> >
> > Loud on 14.089 listening UP, UP (at 0045z).
> >
> > Took a while, but I got them. :)
> >
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 07:15:55 -0500
> From: Steve AI9T <steve at ai9t.com>
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] VP6DX
> To: Jon Maguire <w1mnk at tampabay.rr.com>
> Cc: rtty at contesting.com
> Message-ID: <47C402FB.50805 at ai9t.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Jon
>
>  From what I've seen so far it usually takes 1 to 3 days for a QSO to
> show up in their log. I think today is their last day so I would guess
> their online logs will be caught up by tomorrow evening.
>
> I made my 18th QSO with them this morning!
>
> --
> 73
>
> Steve AI9T
>
> http://www.ai9t.com
>
> QSL via LOTW and EQsL
>
>
>
>
> Jon Maguire wrote:
> > Guys, how long does it take a contact to make it into their online log?
> > Thank you.
> >
> > 73... Jon W1MNK
> >
> > Lee Ratcliff wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I lucked out, and copied the guy he was talking to.  Called once, and
> he got
> >> me.  Worked him on 20 RTTY, and 12m SSB both tonight.  That's odd for
> after
> >> dark here in VA.
> >>
> >> Sparky
> >> KC4ART
> >>
> >>
> >> -------Original Message-------
> >>
> >> From: Peter Laws
> >> Date: 2/25/2008 7:53:58 PM
> >> To: RTTY
> >> Subject: [RTTY] VP6DX
> >>
> >> Loud on 14.089 listening UP, UP (at 0045z).
> >>
> >> Took a while, but I got them. :)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > RTTY mailing list
> > RTTY at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 07:50:29 -0500
> From: Ron DeBlock <rdeblock at att.net>
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] Notes on NAQP-LoTW-Maine
> To: rtty at contesting.com
> Message-ID: <47C40B15.9010207 at att.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Bob, I just wanted to say thanks for your W1SLF operation and the near
> instant LoTW confirmation.  Maine was one of the last 3 states I needed
> to work for RTTY WAS.  The others were VT and CT, and I worked those
> during the NAQP also!  So far, I have 46 states confirmed on RTTY in
> LoTW (missing CT, HI, NV and WY).
>
> I just set up my LoTW account last week.  I was amazed that 51% of my
> NAQP RTTY Q's were confirmed on LoTW within 48 hours!
>
> 73,
>
> Ron N2JSO
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 09:17:01 -0600 (GMT-06:00)
> From: George Henry <ka3hsw at earthlink.net>
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] Screenshots of PropNet interference?
> To: Kok Chen <chen at mac.com>, rtty at contesting.com
> Message-ID:
>        <
> 4866255.1204039021999.JavaMail.root at elwamui-rustique.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> However, there are only TWO U.S. stations that were granted a waiver of
> 97.203(d) by the FCC to participate in the NCDXF/IARU beacon network. No
> one else is authorized to operate an automatically controlled beacon station
> below 28.200.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> >From: Kok Chen <chen at mac.com>
> >Sent: Feb 26, 2008 12:11 AM
> >To: RTTY Reflector <rtty at contesting.com>
> >Subject: Re: [RTTY] Screenshots of PropNet interference?
> >
> >
> >On Feb 25, 2008, at 8:37 PM, George Henry wrote:
> >
> >>> PropNet is actually useful enough that they should initiate an FCC
> >>> petition asking for a small window that is dedicated for such
> >>> propagation studies.
> >>
> >> Except for the whole prohibition against automatically controlled
> >> beaconing
> >> below 28.200 thing.......
> >> (97.203(d))
> >
> >Not everything below 28.200, George.  W6WX/B at 14100 kc and 21250 kc
> >are exceptions that prove the rule which you mentioned.
> >
> >http://www.iaru.org/articles/9410031.pdf
> >
> >The approved stations not only are allowed to operate on 14.100 around
> >the world, that particular window (1 kc wide) is even a guarded IARU
> >frequency for beacon use only; although you can hardly notice it
> >during RTTY contest weekends.
> >
> >73
> >Chen, W7AY
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
>
> End of RTTY Digest, Vol 62, Issue 47
> ************************************
>