[RTTY] SO2R

[Jim W7RY]

Ok Joe.... Then is 2OSR not the same as single operator? No, their multi
operator. No matter how many ops they have, their simply multi operator.
(Not talking about multi  2 or multi multi)


So Joe... Tell me again why SO2R is does not have an advantage over a single
radio? And why they should not be a separate class?


73
Jim W7RY




On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV <lists at subich.com> wrote:

>
> Mike,
>
> My replies to Bill were only in response to his whinny "I don't want
> to have to compete against 'their kind'" nonsense.  Like SO2R or not,
> use SO2R or not, operators who use SO2R are just as much a single
> operator as the guy with an IC-718 and AV-640 on the back deck.  SO2R
> operators should not be prevented from competing against other single
> operator stations any more someone who has a tribander at 70 feet
> should be prevented from competing with those of us who are limited
> to verticals and low wires.
>
> If one does not like SO2R as it is currently structured, the alternative
> is to convince contest sponsors to adopt band change
> limits (e.g., "n" band changes per clock hour) or a "10 minute
> rule."  Such rules significantly limit the "advantage" of SO2R
> techniques while applying the same rules to all.
>
> 73,
>
>    ... Joe, W4TV
>
> On 6/16/2010 7:01 PM, W0MU Mike Fatchett wrote:
> > I guess badgering and being obnoxious is not only limited to post made by
> > W4TV.
> >
> > If all hams had your attitude Ham Radio would have died before it
> started.
> >
> > And I thought we were ambassadors of goodwill.
> >
> > Bill I think you need to use the delete key more and find a more fire
> proof
> > suit OM.
> >
> >
> > CC Packet Cluster W0MU-1
> > W0MU.NET or  67.40.148.194
> >
> > "A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you
> may
> > never get over." Ben Franklin
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>