[RTTY] SO2R

Joe Subich, W4TV lists at subich.com
Thu Jun 17 07:45:15 PDT 2010


Jim,

 > Then is 2OSR not the same as single operator?

Yes, SO2R is the same as single operator - that's why it is
called "Single operator, two radio."

 > No, their multi operator.

No, they are not multi-operator,  There is only ONE person/operator
involved.  This is the same old faulty logic ... there is only ONE
(e.g. SINGLE) operator.

73,

    ... Joe, W4TV

On 6/17/2010 10:16 AM, Jim W7RY wrote:
> Ok Joe.... Then is 2OSR not the same as single operator? No, their
> multi operator. No matter how many ops they have, their simply multi
> operator. (Not talking about multi  2 or multi multi)
>
>
> So Joe... Tell me again why SO2R is does not have an advantage over a
> single radio? And why they should not be a separate class?
>
>
> 73 Jim W7RY
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV<lists at subich.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Mike,
>>
>> My replies to Bill were only in response to his whinny "I don't
>> want to have to compete against 'their kind'" nonsense.  Like SO2R
>> or not, use SO2R or not, operators who use SO2R are just as much a
>> single operator as the guy with an IC-718 and AV-640 on the back
>> deck.  SO2R operators should not be prevented from competing
>> against other single operator stations any more someone who has a
>> tribander at 70 feet should be prevented from competing with those
>> of us who are limited to verticals and low wires.
>>
>> If one does not like SO2R as it is currently structured, the
>> alternative is to convince contest sponsors to adopt band change
>> limits (e.g., "n" band changes per clock hour) or a "10 minute
>> rule."  Such rules significantly limit the "advantage" of SO2R
>> techniques while applying the same rules to all.
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> ... Joe, W4TV
>>
>> On 6/16/2010 7:01 PM, W0MU Mike Fatchett wrote:
>>> I guess badgering and being obnoxious is not only limited to post
>>> made by W4TV.
>>>
>>> If all hams had your attitude Ham Radio would have died before
>>> it
>> started.
>>>
>>> And I thought we were ambassadors of goodwill.
>>>
>>> Bill I think you need to use the delete key more and find a more
>>> fire
>> proof
>>> suit OM.
>>>
>>>
>>> CC Packet Cluster W0MU-1 W0MU.NET or  67.40.148.194
>>>
>>> "A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the
>>> tongue you
>> may
>>> never get over." Ben Franklin
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list
>> RTTY at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>>
> _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>


More information about the RTTY mailing list