[RTTY] AA6YQ FIR512 Parameters

[Jeff Stai]

I concur with Phil. I have tried the AA6YQ FIR and also the twin peak in
the K3. I suspect they are very good in marginal conditions for regular
contacts, however they both seem to be very unforgiving of signals even
slightly off frequency like you see in contests. Which you would kind of
expect....  jeff wk6i


On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Phil & Ann <na4m at arrl.net> wrote:

> On 10/1/2012 11:21, KC4HW/Jim wrote:
>
>> Thanks Dave, well my mistake!
>>
>> In that case did any one use the AA6YQ FIR512 profile or the Dual
>> Peal Filter in MMTTY for the CQ WW RTTY?
>>
>> What did you think about it?
>>
> I did 15m single-band and used the AA6YQ FIR12 profile for the first
> several hours.  Most of my operating was in "run" mode.  The longer I
> operated the more I felt I wasn't getting as good a copy as I should.
>
> I switched to the "hyper sensitive" profile which I've used in previous
> years both for RTTY contests and non-contest RTTY operating with MMTTY.
>  After using it for a modest amount of time it seemed pretty obvious to me
> that I was getting better copy.
>
> Not a very scientific test but I've operated enough RTTY & contests to
> recognize a difference.
>
>  73 Phil NA4M
>
> --
> Phil & Ann Duff
> Georgetown, TX
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/rtty<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty>
>



-- 
Jeff Stai ~ wk6i.jeff at gmail.com
Twisted Oak Winery ~ http://www.twistedoak.com/
Facebook ~ http://www.facebook.com/twistedoak