[RTTY] Rig Blaster Pro and FSK

Larry Gauthier (K8UT) k8ut at k8ut.com
Sat Sep 22 06:00:17 EDT 2012


Bob and Jim,

That customization refers to the RIGblaster Plus - not sure how it compares 
to the Pro. If Bob's attachment didn't survive the reflector, you can 
download the PDF here:
http://www.k8ut.com/tiki-list_file_gallery.php?galleryId=2

-larry (K8UT)
-----Original Message----- 
From: Robert Chudek - K0RC
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 9:45 PM
To: kc4hw at centurytel.net
Cc: rtty at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Rig Blaster Pro and FSK

I don't own a RigBlaster but I have looked at their manual and
schematics more than one time. If I recall correctly, you have to move a
(some) jumpers internally to change between CW and FSK keying. This
requires opening the RigBlaster when you want to change modes. In my
opinion, that's quite disappointing from a usability / convenience
standpoint.

The quick term solution is to reconfigure the RigBlaster. There's a
longer term solution though.

Larry, K8UT has written a document how to upgrade the RigBlaster so the
different modes can be used without opening the box and reconfiguring
the jumpers. I have attached a copy of his procedure.

73 de Bob - KØRC in MN

------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 9/21/2012 8:07 PM, KC4HW/Jim wrote:
> I am trying to help a friend with this problem.
>
> The problem is that when FSK TX there is only one tone!
>
> Using a Rig Blaster Pro with a regular serial port connection (COM4).
> FT-950, WriteLog v10.76H and MMTTY.  Windows 7
>
> This setup uses the same comport for both FSK and CW.  I disabled
> the CW port in lieu of FSK.  So there should not be a conflict.
>
> The rig is on COM3 and appears to be working fine.  However I did
> notice that on the PORT menu everytime we tried to change the
> COMM PTT to "NO" it would change back to "YES"
>
> I really am not familiar with the equipment and what makes matter
> worst is that my friend is 100 miles away.  So we are trying to trouble
> shoot over the telephone.
>
> This was a working setup last year
>
> Does anyone have any suggestion(s), maybe something that might
> stick out to you?
>
> Thanks for any help offered.
>
> Jim/KC4HW
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty 



More information about the RTTY mailing list