[RTTY] Debate

[Greg Rauch]

IMHO....  SOmR operators are like "olympians"..  really amazing stuff.  I'm content with my single radio/amp setup, and do enjoy some really good runs on occasion.
 
Maybe someday contest sponsors will consider an olympian class, for those highly proficient operators/stations that knock the scores out of the park with their amazing skill sets.
 
I once heard an extremely successful (RTTY) op comment that exploitation of contest rules is in the spirt of competition.  I generally agree with that concept... however, as the exploitation of rules becomes more common, as in the case of SOmR, then my suggestion is to create another submittal class, and segment the competitors on that basis.
 
My two cents... and always look forward to having air time during RTTY contests!
 
Vy 73
 
Greg  N6CK

--- On Sat, 2/16/13, Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj at gmail.com> wrote:


From: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj at gmail.com>
Subject: [RTTY] Debate
To: rtty at contesting.com
Date: Saturday, February 16, 2013, 6:29 AM


Nah, let's debate again its been a while.  Using your logic a Multi 
operator is a Multi yet there are M/S, M2, MM  we should just have one 
....right ?


On 2/15/2013 7:34 PM, John Merrill wrote:
> I hope we are not going to get into the debate again that SO2R should be a different category :-). A single op is a single op no matter how many radios or antennas or amps he /she has....right??
>
>

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty