[RTTY] Debate

[John Merrill]

Some contests do have an expert category.

John N1JM


On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 8:40 PM, Greg Rauch <ki6ck at sbcglobal.net> wrote:

> IMHO....  SOmR operators are like "olympians"..  really amazing stuff.
> I'm content with my single radio/amp setup, and do enjoy some really good
> runs on occasion.
>
> Maybe someday contest sponsors will consider an olympian class, for those
> highly proficient operators/stations that knock the scores out of the park
> with their amazing skill sets.
>
> I once heard an extremely successful (RTTY) op comment that exploitation
> of contest rules is in the spirt of competition.  I generally agree with
> that concept... however, as the exploitation of rules becomes more common,
> as in the case of SOmR, then my suggestion is to create another submittal
> class, and segment the competitors on that basis.
>
> My two cents... and always look forward to having air time during RTTY
> contests!
>
> Vy 73
>
> Greg  N6CK
>
> --- On Sat, 2/16/13, Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: Jay WS7I <ws7ik7tj at gmail.com>
> Subject: [RTTY] Debate
> To: rtty at contesting.com
> Date: Saturday, February 16, 2013, 6:29 AM
>
>
> Nah, let's debate again its been a while.  Using your logic a Multi
> operator is a Multi yet there are M/S, M2, MM  we should just have one
> ....right ?
>
>
> On 2/15/2013 7:34 PM, John Merrill wrote:
> > I hope we are not going to get into the debate again that SO2R should be
> a different category :-). A single op is a single op no matter how many
> radios or antennas or amps he /she has....right??
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>



-- 
sent on my MacbookPro