[RTTY] Question...

[David Cole]

Hi Joe,

That does not explain why switching from mode based to bandwidth based
enforcement will change anything.  Your position posits that there are
already commercial users on the ham bands now, and that once allowed to
go broadband, (so to speak), they will then switch to that mode.  Is
this true?  Are there commercial users on the bands now?

Not trying to start a fight here, trying to understand why the fuss
about this.  On the surface it seems OK to me...  However, I do a lot of
CW, and I saw one post talking about someone opening up a 2.5 KC Wide
signal down at 14.025...  Does the current proposal not limit to
sub-bands?  Also several people I respect here are not for it, so I must
be missing something, as it seems innocent to me...

Where can I get a look at the proposal as it will be submitted to the
FCC.
-- 
Thanks and 73's,
For equipment, and software setups and reviews see:
www.nk7z.net
for MixW support see;
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mixw/
for Dopplergram information see:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dopplergram/ 


On Sun, 2013-07-28 at 08:12 -0400, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote: 
> Mode based enforcement essentially limits data throughput.  Most
> commercial users are not interested in channels with throughput
> below a few 10's of kb/s.  Providing 2.8 KHz of bandwidth will
> allow throughput of around 56k with compression.  That becomes
> very interesting for non-priority use.
> 
> 73,
> 
>     ... Joe, W4TV
> 
> 
> On 7/28/2013 7:19 AM, David Cole wrote:
> > Could someone explain to me how switching from a mode based enforcement
> > rule base to a bandwidth enforced method will increase the commercial
> > use of ham radio?  I am not seeing it...
> >
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty